A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Soar Oshkosh 2006



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3  
Old February 15th 06, 12:09 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Soar Oshkosh 2006

Hi Terry:

Having been a close observer and persistant critic of the SSA during
the dog days of the computer system disaster and all that it signified,

I would disagree that nothing has changed:

1. SSA's finances are now handled competently and, importantly, with
considerable transparency.
2. The website, by virtue of an all volunteer effort, has improved
dramatically.
3. Cindy Brickner's efforts to maintain and even increase our access
to airspace in the Owens by opening and maintaining communications

with the authorities have yielded spectacular results as did her
work on
radio frequency misuse. Her efforts are usually low key,
persistent and,
as a result, effective. I'd be surprised if she wasn't involved
in the Phoenix
matter (and more surprised if her involvement was anything but
beneficial).
4. The Hobbs operation, while still not all it could be, has improved
greatly
since a visit I made some years ago when I walked through the
front door
and was completely ignored, even when I wandered behind the
counter.
5. My guess is that the resistance to the OSH effort had to do with
where the
money would come from, not its desirability.

Are there still problems? Sure! Big ones!

1. An organization with a shrinking membership needs to publicise and
recruit as if
it's life depended on it.
2. Hobbs is not an ideal home for a national organization if for no
other reason than
its limited access for members and volunteers. Isolation tends to
create a bunker
mentality in the staff as well.
3. Equipment requirements are not, IMHO, our biggest regulatory
threat; that honour
goes to TSA's orgy of TFR's, etc..
4. Do-nothing directors can be voted out; failing that, bylaws could
be written setting
out a director's duties and penalties for failure to perform them.
(Really bad ones
could be encouraged to run for Congress.)

Many of these problems are being addressed; some wait to be addressed.

Some may never be addressed. Never-the-less, real changes have taken
place,
on balance for the better.

Raphael Warshaw
1LK

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aviation Weather Workshop Locations for 2006! scottd Aviation Marketplace 0 December 10th 05 01:47 AM
USA / CFIG Recertification Clinic Schedule / 2006 / SSF [email protected] Soaring 0 November 29th 05 04:55 PM
Oshkosh Reflections Jay Honeck Owning 44 August 7th 05 02:31 PM
Oshkosh Reflections Jay Honeck Piloting 45 August 7th 05 02:31 PM
How I got to Oshkosh (long) Doug Owning 2 August 18th 03 12:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.