A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

AUTOPILOT AWRY



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8  
Old February 15th 06, 02:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AUTOPILOT AWRY


Clearly that is quite different. I suspect that RFI may have been one
of the reasons they went to the much lower frequencies...

FYI, my coupler has a 4-pin Amphelnol connector for the radio input
and a 9-pin Amphenol connector for connection to the DG and autopilot
amplifier. In my case, the coupler could not be eliminated from the
system by simply moving connectors around.

Too bad. With the Century (aka Autocontrol) units the basic "computer"
plugs in to the AH and you have wing leveler capability. If you have
the right DG (i.e. with the heading bug) then a second cable plugs into
the DG and you now have heading control as well. [Hence the separate
ROLL EXCITATION and HDG EXCITATION.] When they added the little NAV
Coupler unit, all that was needed there was to unplug the computer's DG
cable from the DG and plug it into the NAV Coupler. The NAV coupler
then had a cable that went out to the DG.

With the NAV Coupler in HDG mode, it was essentially then just a
pass-through. The DG signals basically went through the NAV Coupler as
if it was nothing but an extension cord. [Except, as another poster
mentioned, the NAV Coupler still generated a new version of the
EXCITATION signal.]

With the NAV coupler in tracking mode, it simply took the DG offset,
played the same "in/out of phase" game that the computer normally would
to provide an offset, added in the offset from whatever L-R signal it
was tracking, chopped it back up, and sent the new sine wave back to
the computer. The computer never knew it was tracking anything but the
DG heading bug. [BTW, all the nav coupler tracking modes are just
variations on a theme. The LOC mode (Localizer) just has a different
divider resistor on the L-R so the sensitivity is changed. The OMNI
vs. NAV mode just adds a capacitor to slow up it's ability to respond
to quick changes in the L-R signal. And the LOC Backcourse? Yup...
the switch just switches the L-R input wires so that it responds
backwards.]

[I'd be happy to learn all you're willing to teach me about these
things. If you have any schematics or theory of operations on the
early Autocontrol / Altimatic
I/II amplifiers and/or on the early radio couplers, I'd really
appreciate getting a copy. ]

A while back I scanned in the schematics for the Autocontrol computers
and the NAV coupler. I don't know if they are still around or not
(really poor quality originals). I'll try to see if I can find them.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KAP140 autopilot and a KLN94 GPS question STICKMONKE Instrument Flight Rules 5 November 12th 05 04:06 AM
mitchell autopilot dave Owning 1 May 5th 04 06:11 PM
IMC without an autopilot Jon Kraus Instrument Flight Rules 101 April 18th 04 07:17 PM
Chelton AP-3C autopilot Kyler Laird Owning 0 April 2nd 04 03:08 PM
KAP140 Autopilot Details News Instrument Flight Rules 27 October 22nd 03 02:01 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.