![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:34:37 -0600, Rachel wrote:
Jim wrote: On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:15:13 -0600, "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote: "Roger" wrote in message ... As do many over-the-counter meds. You take them for a while to see if there is any adverse side effects and if none, you fly. Quite some time back I took an antibiotic which killed all the good critters as well as the bad. I didn't fly, of course part of that was because I didn't dare get more than about a 100 feet from the can for a while. Many people have some reaction to specific foods and probably most haven't even made the connection. I don't know the numbers, but my understanding is, it's quite a large number. Just because a bunch of people have a reaction to ... say tomatoes, they are not a banned substance and if you have an allergy or reaction to them you report it, and stay away from tomatoes. I agree with Ron, if the person has no adverse effects from the drugs and does not have physiological problems then why ban them when the purpose for the prescription is not a problem. There is a wide difference from the effects of a food allergy and that of a psychoactive drug. The psychoactive drug effect can be very slow onset and not outwardly visible. Add to that the fact the effect may be that you want to kill yourself or someone else I think the FAA has a pretty good set of rules in effect on this one. In my view, this attitude is tragic and uninformed. It ignores the living experiences of many who benefit from these medications and who function better with them than without them in all aspects of their lives. So what happens when someone forgets to take their medicine or slips and ends up in a major depressive episode and *won't* take it? I confess I don't know how to seriously answer this question. One answer, I guess the one you are looking for, is that the person in question will thereby become unsafe as a pilot if the reason for the medication also renders the person unsafe as a pilot, or if there is an effect to the lapse in taking the medication that renders the individual unsafe as a pilot. This seems simple. I suppose that if a "major depressive episode" does result suddenly, a very unlikely sudden outcome, the individual may find just getting out of bed too much of a challenge to face. Flying may not be in the cards for the individual at that time. These medications must be considered with caution and with careful attention to the circumstances that have led to an individual being prescribed these medications and to the effects the medications may have on the individual. It is easy to think of circumstances, real circumstances, that render an individual unsafe as a pilot. This CAN be one of them, but it is not the case that it MUST be one of them. There are other medical conditions requiring on-going medication that may not be disqualifying. These medications are prescribed for many situations other than "major depressive episodes". It is a sad and unjust attitude to ignore the individual's circumstances. As it would be for the other medical conditions that may allow for wavers after individual evaluation. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFI without commercial? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 75 | December 8th 10 04:17 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Question Medical | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 5 | June 11th 04 05:12 AM |
Question on medical and kidney stones | nospam | Piloting | 13 | November 8th 03 07:10 AM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |