![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bob Noel wrote: The move to RNP is, in part, driven by the desire for increased airspace capacity, including airspace with limited radar coverage. No doubt about its usefulness in areas with limited, or no, radar coverage. But, I doubt that offset tracks would do much good there. Where the terrain environment would permit parallel tracks, the publication of parallel tracks as separate database routes would probably be much safer than issuing parallel tracks in a non-radar environment. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Arlington NASCAR track dead? | Rich S. | Home Built | 51 | December 8th 04 03:34 AM |
The battle for Arlington Airport begins? | Paul Adriance | Home Built | 45 | March 30th 04 11:41 PM |
how I map my flights | Snowbird | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | November 30th 03 11:26 PM |
Using Excel or Access to keep track of students/records? | BoDEAN | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | October 2nd 03 05:07 AM |
Downloading GPS track data and overlaying charts | John Galban | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | July 25th 03 03:15 PM |