|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
February 23rd 06, 03:34 AM
posted to rec.travel.air,alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
|
|||
|
|||
Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONSon 9/11
TRUTH wrote: Jones does not need to be a building engineer. He's a physicist and is therefore qualified to determine if the government's version defies physics. And since his paper, and the 150 people in st911.org, use science, and not kooky proofless boxcutter nonsense, they can see that the WTC was taken down by controled demolitions. So can anyone else who looks at the information I posted. Not really. He is lately an expert in Cold Fusion and Christ's visit to America. His arguments are not particularly plausible or convincing. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11 | Darkwing | Piloting | 15 | March 8th 06 01:38 AM |
| Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11 | TRUTH | Piloting | 0 | February 23rd 06 01:06 AM |
| American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
| Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
Threaded Mode