Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11

Jim Logajan wrote in
:

TRUTH wrote:
FACT: WTC 7 was ***NOT*** hit by an airplane!

When the buildings next to it collapsed, all the kinetic energy of
the debris radiated outward on impacting the ground. It got hit by a
"shaped" explosion that tore into its base. No mystery except to
those who get their physics second hand.

totally illogical. It never happened before.

You are unqualified to make that determination. As I said before, I
have a physics degree. You don't. Contact the University of Minnesota
and ask them if James Logajan holds a degree in physics if you don't
believe me.

I believe you.



I'm using my real name and have nothing to hide. What is your real
name, and where did you get your education? If you insist on arguing
from authority, you need to present your credentials.


With the stuff I'm volunteering in, I would never give my real name. I rely
on credentials of people like Dr Jones who know what *all* the evidence is.
And I try to get people to understand it.

If the evidence is false, it should be explained why it is false.




FACT: The WTC 7 collapse mimicked controlled demolition, as did the
Towers. They all collapsed almost symmetrically, near free fall
speed, into their own footprints.

Steel frame buildings have collapsed in strong earthquakes in
precisely the same manner. Scroll down to "Totally Collapsed
21-Story Steel Frame Office Building" in this set of slides:

http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/seg/hazard/...3_slides.shtml


None of those building's collapsed almost symmetrically, near free
fall speed, into their own footprints. And none of those Mexico City
buildings are steel framed.

Which part of "Totally Collapsed 21-Story Steel Frame Office Building"
do you not understand? Why do you outright lie when presented with
facts like these? The photo shows the remains of a steel framed
building that has clearly collapsed into its own footprint.


Hmmmm... I will check into that. That was from an earthquake though.




FACT: There were small puffs of smoke (known as squibs) coming out
of all three buildings, a sign of controlled demolitions.

Puffs of smoke may be fact - "sign of controlled demolition" is
speculation. So your statement is not a fact. If puffs of smoke had
not come out of the buildings immediately prior to collapse, then
THAT would have been peculiar!


Watch the clips

http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html


See the squibs he

http://st12.startlogic.com/
~xenonpup/Flashes/squibs_along_southwest_corner.htm

1) Explosions would be set to occur before or at the collapse - not
after.

The WTC 7 squibs from the startlogic site above come a few miliseconds
after the collapse starts.


The squibs in the Towers come right below the sections that are collapsing.
And this continues in different sections (on different floors) as the
Towers collapse.


2) If the lower floors collapsed first, then the compressed air
must escape somehow - windows would be expected to be blown out as the
building collapses.


Jones proved that the air expulsion theory is discounted. Search his paper
for "expulsion":
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html



3) If there was a conspiracy to blow up the building, it would have
been easier to blow one side of the building - only an incompetent
conspirator would go to the trouble of planting explosives in the
upper floors _and_ arrange a symmetrical collapse. Needless hard work.


Yes. And the collapses of all three buildings mimick expert, perfect
controlled demolition.

WTC 7 had several government agencies, and a lot of ENRON documents. It is
theorized that that was one reason to completely destroy the building.


Please watch the video clips of WTC7 collapsing. The fact of controlled
demolition is more than obvious. Compare it to implosions at
www.implosionworld.com




FACT: WTC 7 leaseholder Larry Silverstein bought a 99 yr lease on
the entire WTC complex just six weeks before 9/11, which just
happened to include terrorist attack insurance

Wouldn't all the drilling, wiring, and planting of explosives that
needed to be done to WTC 7 have been noticed by people? Do you know
how hard it is to hide an undertaking like that!?


Yes I do. In the South Tower, there was a power down the weekend
before 9/11. Also, Bush's brother Marvin was one of the directors in
charge of WTC security.

Um, doesn't lack of power make drilling harder? And just how does one
person manage such a vast security breach? This is taking place in the
center of an area that has one of the highest population densities on
the planet. Don't you think that someone might have noticed something?
How many people do you think live and work near there anyway???


What you said is all true. We will never know exactly how it was done.



FACT: The structural engineer that worked for Silverstein's
insurance company told the Discovery Channel that the Towers'
massive vertical columns all failed simultaneously, and mimicked
controlled demolition

Since a steel frame building collapsed in just the same manner in a
Mexican earthquake, we now know that simultaneous collapse does not
need human action.


This is not true

Explain why not.


That must have been the only steel framed building to ever completely
collapse from anything other than controlled demolition. Still, it did not
collapse from fire, and we don't know how long it took for that collapse to
occur. For all we know, it could have taken hours. And, although I admit
not being an expert, I would bet it could not really be classified as a
total collapse.


You're a physicist? Please take the time to read Jones' paper in it's
entirely. Also take the other information into consideration. If you're a
physicist, and you look at the real information, you should have problem
seeing it.