![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 04:38:37 -0000, Jim Logajan wrote:
FACT: WTC 7 leaseholder Larry Silverstein bought a 99 yr lease on the entire WTC complex just six weeks before 9/11, which just happened to include terrorist attack insurance Wouldn't all the drilling, wiring, and planting of explosives that needed to be done to WTC 7 have been noticed by people? Do you know how hard it is to hide an undertaking like that!? Yes I do. In the South Tower, there was a power down the weekend before 9/11. Also, Bush's brother Marvin was one of the directors in charge of WTC security. Um, doesn't lack of power make drilling harder? And just how does one person manage such a vast security breach? This is taking place in the center of an area that has one of the highest population densities on the planet. Don't you think that someone might have noticed something? How many people do you think live and work near there anyway??? There is a couple of massive flaws in the WTC-7 preset demolition theory. 1) Why bother blowing up WTC-7 at all? Do they honestly expect us to believe that the government actually sat down and said at a meeting "You know, taking out one of America's most prominent landmarks and killing 3,000 people just won't be enough to enrage the public. But I've got a plan, we'll also blow up WTC-7, an empty building that 99.999% of the people in the country never even heard of to ensure the outrage we need." 2) Why set up a building to be demolished if no plane is going to hit it? There is no way that they knew in advance that large pieces of debris would hit WTC-7 and start a fire that burned uncontrolled for half a day. What would have been the explanation if the building was blown up and it hadn't suffered any significant damage? None of the surrounding buildings was blown up after suffering no significant damage and none of them were found with tons of preset explosives. The only possible logical explanation would be that WTC-7 was set for demoltion that very day, after the planes hit. Hundreds of highly trained demolitons specialists snuck tons of explosives into a smoke filled burning building and executed a controlled demolition in 7 hours, in the midst of one of the most intensive disaster recovery procedures ever mounted in the US. Not only did they manage this incredible feat completely undetected, not one of the hundreds of people involved ever talked about it. And this was done for absolutely no reason at all, see #1 above. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11 | Darkwing | Piloting | 15 | March 8th 06 01:38 AM |
Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11 | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 120 | March 6th 06 02:37 AM |
Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11 | TRUTH | Piloting | 0 | February 23rd 06 01:06 AM |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |