A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old February 23rd 06, 04:01 PM posted to rec.travel.air,alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONSon 9/11

TRUTH wrote:
Dan wrote in news:RbkLf.23571$Ug4.14981@dukeread12:

TRUTH wrote:
Mike wrote in
:

On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 03:48:20 GMT, TRUTH wrote:


His arguments are based on scientific principles. They do not have
to be convincing, since scientific laws cannot be changed, such as
the Law of Increasing Entropy. Are you an engineer or physicist?
Yes, I am a structural engineer and registered PE.
How do explain THREE collapses at near free fall speed? First time
in history from fire!
It is called progressive collapse. This is when a smaller less
significant failure causes an overall greater failure.
Where did the energy come from to pulvarize concrete and office
furniture into particles of fine powder?
The concrete and other materials had a large amounts of potential
energy stored when they were raised to a higher elevation in the
building. BTW, you don't need to be an engineer to know this, you
need to have not slept through 6th grade science class.
Where did the force come to *evaporate* steel?
Steel doesn't evaporate. ASCE (an independent non-government
organization) determined from analysis that "The thinning of the
steel occurred by a high temperature corrosion due to a combination
of oxidation and sulfidation.
Why was there moltel metal and yellow-hot metal under the Towers
(AND BUILDING 7) weeks after 9/11? (Those colors are consistant
with thermite explosives.)
Fire. BTW it can be consistant with many things.
Also, why did the government hall away and destroy the evidence
before it could be properly analyzed?
See above about ASCE analyzing the steel.



Mike, you are a registered PE structural engineer?


Sir, in your professional, expert, experienced opinion, what caused
this 47 story steel framed building to collapse?

http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html


Also, note these "squibs" from the SW corner
http://st12.startlogic.com/
~xenonpup/Flashes/squibs_along_southwest_corner.htm

No squibs or other explosive devices are shown.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired




The links above were not meant for you. I pasted your linked in the other
post where you asked me to do you the favor of doing so


Oh, I wasn't supposed to look?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11 Darkwing Piloting 15 March 8th 06 01:38 AM
Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11 TRUTH Piloting 0 February 23rd 06 01:06 AM
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.