Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11

"Frank F. Matthews" wrote in
:



TRUTH wrote:

Dan wrote in news:98qLf.24056$Ug4.23277@dukeread12:


TRUTH wrote:

Dan wrote in news:golLf.23584$Ug4.4830@dukeread12:


TRUTH wrote:

Dan wrote in news:wUkLf.23574$Ug4.702@dukeread12:


TRUTH wrote:

Dan wrote in news:uIjLf.23565$Ug4.14143

@dukeread12:

TRUTH wrote:

Dan wrote in
news:CLgLf.22529$Ug4.21186@dukeread12:


TRUTH wrote:


Totally illogical reasoning. Your statements are not
scientific. There are dozens of things you are not taking
into
consideration.

You keep using the word "scientific" without any apparent
understanding of its meaning. Why do you keep demanding
"scientific proof" when you don't even understand the science

in

Jones' paper? You said so yourself.

You are putting words in my mouth and twisting their meaning.
Please Stop.

I didn't put anything in your mouth, YOU keep using the term
"scientific proof" and YOU said you don't understand the science
in Jones' paper. It's clear you have no idea what scientific

proof

is

and

therefore nothing will ever convince you your conspiracy theory

is

full of holes.

Give me a few specfic examples. Where exactly are the holes?




If you actually believe the government's nonsense, you should
have no problem explaining WHY Jones' evidence does not
apply.
Go read his paper.. A PAPER BASED ON SCIENCE, and debunk his
statements.

It's been done several times, but you don't understand it

any

more
than you understand Jones.

It's been done? Where???? I know of no physicists or engineers
who debunked Jones' paper.

Several in this thread and others like rec.aviation.homebuilt
have
debunked Jones' paper. You just choose to ignore that fact.

Do me the favor and point me to the thread.




It's only

the crackpots who believe absurd ideas when all the
scientific

evidence

shows otherwise.

Jones is hardly "all the scientific evidence," he's just
the
one you
choose to believe. When someone provides an FE you say it's
not
scientific. FEA is scientific in that the results are
reproducible, fit the known laws of science and have passed

peer

review. The fact you don't understand FEA doesn't make it
nonscientific.

Prove yourself to be normal. Take the time and go

through his paper. Here's the URL

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html


I have and I disagree with his findings. I won't explain
why
because
you won't understand, you will accuse me of being

"unscientific"

or simply dismiss my responses out of hand.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


That's your excuse for the fact that you can't debunk it.

I don't have to. Several people with engineering degrees in

the

various groups you have spewed your theories into have done
exactly that. Go back and reread. I said I wouldn't because you
wouldn't understand or you'd accuse me of being unscientific
because that is exactly what happened when the engineering types
tried to explain things to you.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


Yeah? Where? Show me.

Go look.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired


Type out the thread's sunject line, and I'll find and read through

it

Start with this tread. I am not going to do it for you.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired




No where in this thread were Jones' 17 arguments debunked

True, but several of his arguments have been.

Look at the bright side: you have learned a squib is not a puff of
smoke, that burning jet fuel can melt steel and that jets don't fly om
diesel fuel.

Dan, U.S. Air Air Force, retired




You are not qualified to make any of those statments, and I do not
believe any of them to be true. Besides, you are using them as red
herrings to distort the fact that your case holds no water


Then again you have shown no qualifications to make any statements.
You
simply hide behind the comments by an expert in cold fusion and the
visits of Christ to America.

Quit asking about everyone else's qualifications until you show some
for
your self.



I use his statements because he's a physicist who has been giving
seminars and convincing hundreds and hundreds of people the past few
months. His expert opinion are convincing to many.


I myself knew the WTC was professionaly demolished way before I heard of
Jones. Just looking at ALL the evidence and putting it in context makes
it crystal clear.


btw, why were two of the anthrax letters sent to senators who opposed the
Patriot act? Why was the White House put on Cipro *before* those letters
were delivered?

Take a look in the mirror and admit that you have been duped by an evil
government