![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() TRUTH wrote: Pooh Bear wrote in : The issue of whether or not the hijackers were instrument rated is of zero consequence in the context of 9/11 since the weather was VFR ( visual flight rules ). Commercial pilots often have to fly in rather poorer weather where you may not be able to see the ground, horizon, or even much in front of your nose. That's why they have instrument ratings. The idea behind flying 'on instruments' is about when you can't see where you're going. The reaon for the FAA rules about mandatory use of 'IFR' ( instrument flight rules ) flight is essentially precautionary. Graham Do you know that this, in fact, is applicable for 757/767s ?? It applies to all major airline operations. If you want the details see the FAA regs. Graham |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Miss L. Toe | Piloting | 11 | February 23rd 06 02:25 PM |
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Jim Macklin | Piloting | 12 | February 22nd 06 10:09 PM |
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Bob Gardner | Piloting | 18 | February 22nd 06 08:25 PM |
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Scott M. Kozel | Piloting | 1 | February 22nd 06 03:38 AM |