|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#8
February 24th 06, 02:40 PM
posted to rec.travel.air,alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
|
|||
|
|||
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible
In article ,
TRUTH wrote: Flying in clear skies does not require an instrument rating. At 30,000 feet it does Only if you're worried about being fined or having your license taken away. I have plenty of photos taken from airplanes that show enough ground detail (to the point where you can recognize specific highway interchanges and landmarks). You can easily see Manhattan Island from that height (I recognized it from a plane en route to Boston from Miami once, from 30,000+ feet and fifteen or more miles horizontal separation, with less-than-perfect weather conditions). 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Miss L. Toe | Piloting | 11 | February 23rd 06 02:25 PM |
| Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Jim Macklin | Piloting | 12 | February 22nd 06 10:09 PM |
| Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Bob Gardner | Piloting | 18 | February 22nd 06 08:25 PM |
| Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Scott M. Kozel | Piloting | 1 | February 22nd 06 03:38 AM |
Threaded Mode