|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#9
February 25th 06, 01:50 AM
posted to rec.travel.air,alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
|
|||
|
|||
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible
In article ,
"Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote: Newps wrote: Flying in clear skies does not require an instrument rating. At 30,000 feet it does Why? What does altitude have to do with it? Airspace between 18,000 feet MSL and Flight Level 600 is designated Class A airspace and all operations there must be conducted under IFR. http://www.asy.faa.gov/safety_produc...spaceclass.htm ....so the hijackers couldn't possibly have done it, since they might have faced some severe fines or jail time if they got caught flying those planes illegally when they crashed them into the towers. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Miss L. Toe | Piloting | 11 | February 23rd 06 02:25 PM |
| Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Jim Macklin | Piloting | 12 | February 22nd 06 10:09 PM |
| Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Bob Gardner | Piloting | 18 | February 22nd 06 08:25 PM |
| Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Scott M. Kozel | Piloting | 1 | February 22nd 06 03:38 AM |
Threaded Mode