Scholars for 9/11 Truth -- HTTP://ST911.ORG

In article ,
TRUTH wrote:

mrtravel wrote in news:QkyMf.25472$_S7.7736
@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com:

TRUTH wrote:


That's right. I have shown that there's no evidence that a 757 hit the
Pentagon

YOU (TRUTH) posted this link which indicate the story of "NO Boeing
hitting the Pentagon" is a hoax. That is to say, a Boeing DID hit the
Pentago. Don't blame us, you posted the link to the proof.

http://www.oilempire.us/bogus.html

Now, correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't this website show that a 757
DID hit the Pentagon?

From the website:

"it is subtle, but if you look at the photos you can see the damage to
the facade matches the width of a 757 - full size photos at
www.oilempire.us/pentagon.html
The "no Boeing hit the Pentagon" claim is the most important and
widespread 9/11 hoax"


That's what I get for not checking into it first

That seems to be an endemic problem with the "9/11 Truth Movement."

The signal/noise ratio there approaches zero.