A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Impossibility of Flying Heavy Aircraft Without Training



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old March 1st 06, 04:19 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.student
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default lift, wings, and Bernuolli


Jose wrote:
I think you are refering to Newton's third law, often stated as: "For
every action there is an equal and opposite reaction."


Yes.

For an aircraft in level flight, the upwards acceleration due to lift
is counterbalanced by the downward acceleration due to gravity.
This satisfies Newton's third law.


Yes.

For a wing in level flight, the vertical component of momentum is
zero.


No.


Please show us your arithmetic. Suppose a 1500 lb airplane is
flying horizontally at 120 mph at 5000 feet above MSL. What
are the vertical and horizontal components of the momentum
of that aircraft?


That is, on a microscopic scale, no. The wing is constantly
freefalling, then being bounced back up by impact with air molecules.
Averaged over all the molecules, yes, the net is zero (the wing flies)
but on a microscopic scale, the wing is in constant brownian motion.
This implies momentum transfer, and following the momentum on a
microscopic scale is instructive.


OK, show us your arithmetic.

The wing imparts
as much upward momentum to the air as it does downward momentum.


This is where I disagree. Upward momentum gets imparted, but not
(directly) by the wing. Rather, it is imparted by the ground, mediated
through other air molecules.


The ground is stationary. How does the stationary ground impart
momentum to anything?

Of course this wouldn't happen if the wing
didn't pass through and throw the air down to begin with, but the ground
is what ultimately imparts the upwards momentum.

The pressure differential through the wing, from bottom to top,
integrated
over the wing area, provides an upward force for a wing in level
flight.


That's the shortcut. Where does this pressure differential come from -


Bernouli effect.

that is the question.

The downwash behind the aircraft, which is counterbalanced by a more
diffuse upwash around it, is real but not relevent to the issue of
lift.


I disagree here too. It's important in seeing the entire picture.


Well, yes it is part of the entire picture. Its just not relevent to
the
issue of lift, which is only part of the picture.

--

FF

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
GAO: Electronic Warfa Comprehensive Strategy Needed for Suppressing Enemy Mike Naval Aviation 0 December 27th 05 06:23 PM
Washington DC airspace closing for good? tony roberts Piloting 153 August 11th 05 12:56 AM
Sport Pilot pilots not insurable? Blueskies Piloting 14 July 12th 05 05:45 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.