![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It does that
because there are fewer air molecules transfering momentum to it from above, that there are from below. But it does not do that via a coherent stream of air. I guess I should have appended this to the previous response... This is correct. However, a coherent stream of air is not necessary for this: The movement of the plane towards the earth is transferred to movement of the air towards the earth, which it does until it eventually transfers its momentum back *to* the earth, leaving the system with the same relative momentum with which it began. to also be correct. A coherent stream of air is not required, nor is it what I am proposing. A fluid can transmit force without flow in the conventional sense. That is the basis for hydraulics. We are not really talking about "flow in the conventional sense", we are talking about microscopic collisions. Flow may be involved (as in the flow that causes upwash upflight) but it needn't be (as in the case of the microscopic dribbler). The downflow observed from the wing initiates above the wing and flows down behind the wing after the wing has passed. It is not the air that suppors the wing. Well, the only air that supports the wing is are the molecules that impact it from below. They not only support the wing, they also fight against the molecules impacting from above. They win, because there are more of them. There are more of them because of downflow and the collisions it causes. Well then if the downflow is NOT balanced by upflow why doesn't the upper atmosphere run out of air? Because the wing is not of infinite weight. The upper atmosphere in fact =is= deprived of air while the airplane is in flight... that air is squeezed down below the wing, increasing the pressure on the surface of the earth, in an amount exactly equal to the weight of the airplane (divided by the area of the earth). If a sufficient (huge!) number of aircraft took to the air, the upper atmosphere would become measurably thinner. Maybe we should get a grant to do this experiment using general aviation aircraft - for the good of Science and the benefit of GA pilots. ![]() Jose -- Money: what you need when you run out of brains. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
GAO: Electronic Warfa Comprehensive Strategy Needed for Suppressing Enemy | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 27th 05 06:23 PM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |
Sport Pilot pilots not insurable? | Blueskies | Piloting | 14 | July 12th 05 05:45 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |