![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave S wrote:
: If you dont take their "recommended vector" they can terminate your : radar services arbitrarily under the "workload" clause. : If you want flight following, you have to play ball. Right... my original point refers to controllers who categorically vector any VFR traffic that chooses to talk to them from their current position outside the controlled airspace to a position even more outside of the controlled airspace. I would think controllers would prefer anyone within the area to be in communication with them and not penalize those VFR folk who chose to play by vectoring them around. It's safer for everyone to be in communication and close to somebody else than to be just as close without communication. -Cory -- ************************************************** *********************** * The prime directive of Linux: * * - learn what you don't know, * * - teach what you do. * * (Just my 20 USm$) * ************************************************** *********************** |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Logging approaches | Ron Garrison | Instrument Flight Rules | 109 | March 2nd 04 05:54 PM |
FAA letter on flight into known icing | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 78 | December 22nd 03 07:44 PM |
Sim time loggable? | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | December 6th 03 07:47 AM |
IFR flight plan filing question | Tune2828 | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | July 23rd 03 03:33 AM |