![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Lamb wrote:
David CL Francis wrote: On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 at 02:27:02 in message . net, Richard Lamb wrote: I hate to be a spoil sport (or dullard?), but... the (stationary) air does WHAT (as the wing passes by)??? The nature of things is such that the situation does not change if you change the frame of reference. It is normal in doing calculations to start with a frame of reference based on the aircraft. If you follow the aircraft then the air is going past it. The presence of the wing changes the air flowing past the aircraft in the same way as if you consider the aircraft passing through the air. The 'stationary' air as you call it has its local velocity and direction changed by the aircraft. Yeahbut... A handy frame of reference is - handy. But it can be very misleading..... For instance? If the air is moving, we expect a lower pressure. Nod to Bernoulli. But the air would also be moving along the bottom side of the wing also? And what would that do to the pressure under the wing? And if the pressure under the wing is below ambient.... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
GAO: Electronic Warfa Comprehensive Strategy Needed for Suppressing Enemy | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 27th 05 06:23 PM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |
Sport Pilot pilots not insurable? | Blueskies | Piloting | 14 | July 12th 05 05:45 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |