![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ben Flewett wrote: The answer is simple. The ASK 21 is a quality glider. I have to agree with that. The K-21 is a quality glider. The PW6 is a lower quality glider built to a price. I'd like you to explain just exactly how it is lower quality. Materials, finish, design, ergonomics, L/D, what? Comparing these two gliders is like comparing a BMW and a Hyundai. In the United States, BMW sales numbers are declining. They haven't been in the top ten in build quality for at least the last five years. Maybe you meant to say a Honda or Toyota, huh? Hyundai cars seem to be getting better every year as evidenced by their 10 year/100,000 mile warrenty, new models and consistantly increasing sales in the U.S. If you are struggling with the answer to your question I suggest you take a closer look at the two aircraft. If you can't see the difference in build quality then you have even less engineering awareness than me - and that's saying something. Again, I'm curious about your comment. Please enlighten me with your specific details about build quality. I see by your previous post that you don't like Jantars either. Is there a problem with their build quality also? I can see you making a positive comment about the K-21 if you prefer it, but I don't understand why you get any satisfaction from putting down other people's ships. These two place ships are mostly bought by clubs and most clubs, at least here in the U.S. are on a budget. So, Yes a $40,000 price difference plus lower refinish costs and lower parts costs are a very good incentive to purchase a PW-6. Check the tailplane hookup arrangement. Note that when you sit in the back of the 21 you actually have instruments. I looked at the PW-6 website and it looks to me like the PW-6 has an altimeter, airspeed indicator, two varios, a turn and bank and a compass in the back seat. You have another look: http://jarek24.w.interia.pl/pw/pw6/p...tml/pw6-19.htm Just how many more instruments do you need? Also, check the finish of a 5 year old 6 vs a 5 year old 21. Let's see, a polyurethene paint job versus a gel coat refinish. Hmmmm, which costs a lot more? There's nothing wrong with the PW6 if you are buying to a price. It lower quality and therefore cheaper. Again, could you please be more specific about this quaility issue. You always get what you pay for. That is not necessarily true. I'd like to add the comment that if not for lower cost alternatives from Checz, Italy or Poland (ie. competition) the German gliders would cost even more. Willie G. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A36 for Family Trips | Bob | Owning | 9 | June 9th 05 04:06 AM |
SU-37 Family avionics equipment | LIM | Military Aviation | 0 | April 28th 04 03:17 AM |
Flying and the New Family | Marco Leon | Piloting | 33 | December 24th 03 06:11 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
Lindbergh's other family | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 11 | December 3rd 03 12:30 AM |