A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

PW-6 family fun ------



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20  
Old March 7th 06, 04:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default PW-6 family fun ------


Ben Flewett wrote:
The answer is simple. The ASK 21 is a quality glider.


I have to agree with that. The K-21 is a quality glider.

The PW6 is a lower quality glider built to a price.


I'd like you to explain just exactly how it is lower quality.
Materials, finish, design, ergonomics, L/D, what?

Comparing these two gliders is like comparing a BMW
and a Hyundai.


In the United States, BMW sales numbers are declining.
They haven't been in the top ten in build quality for at
least the last five years. Maybe you meant to say a
Honda or Toyota, huh?

Hyundai cars seem to be getting better every year as
evidenced by their 10 year/100,000 mile warrenty, new
models and consistantly increasing sales in the U.S.

If you are struggling with the answer to your question
I suggest you take a closer look at the two aircraft.
If you can't see the difference in build quality then
you have even less engineering awareness than me -
and that's saying something.


Again, I'm curious about your comment. Please enlighten
me with your specific details about build quality.

I see by your previous post that you don't like Jantars
either. Is there a problem with their build quality also?

I can see you making a positive comment about the
K-21 if you prefer it, but I don't understand why you
get any satisfaction from putting down other people's
ships.

These two place ships are mostly bought by clubs and
most clubs, at least here in the U.S. are on a budget.
So, Yes a $40,000 price difference plus lower refinish
costs and lower parts costs are a very good incentive
to purchase a PW-6.

Check the tailplane hookup arrangement. Note that
when you sit in the back of the 21 you actually have
instruments.


I looked at the PW-6 website and it looks to me like the
PW-6 has an altimeter, airspeed indicator, two varios,
a turn and bank and a compass in the back seat.

You have another look:
http://jarek24.w.interia.pl/pw/pw6/p...tml/pw6-19.htm

Just how many more instruments do you need?

Also, check the finish of a 5 year old 6 vs a 5 year
old 21.


Let's see, a polyurethene paint job versus a gel coat refinish.
Hmmmm, which costs a lot more?

There's nothing wrong with the PW6 if you are buying
to a price. It lower quality and therefore cheaper.


Again, could you please be more specific about this
quaility issue.

You always get what you pay for.


That is not necessarily true.

I'd like to add the comment that if not for lower cost
alternatives from Checz, Italy or Poland (ie. competition)
the German gliders would cost even more.

Willie G.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A36 for Family Trips Bob Owning 9 June 9th 05 04:06 AM
SU-37 Family avionics equipment LIM Military Aviation 0 April 28th 04 03:17 AM
Flying and the New Family Marco Leon Piloting 33 December 24th 03 06:11 PM
PC flight simulators Bjørnar Bolsøy Military Aviation 178 December 14th 03 12:14 PM
Lindbergh's other family Larry Dighera Piloting 11 December 3rd 03 12:30 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.