![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Paul Tomblin) wrote:
I find the 195's screen very easy to read - I have no objections to it at all. So I figure the 196's screen should be the same. But I have questions about the readability of the 296 and 396 colour screens - are they as good in bright sunlight? Can their backlights be dimmed right down when flying at night? I have a 296, and a friend has a 396. I'd heard the concern about seeing a color screen in the daylight before I bought it. It's NO problem whatsoever to see the screen/features in the sunlight (I'm in AZ!). You can adjust the brightness to your liking on both units, and both change illumination on their own at sunset/sunrise. There are many mounts available in addition to the ones it comes with. Finally, if I were to NOT get the XM weather subscription right away, is there any point to the 396 over the 296, or is the XM the only real difference between them? I don't know what *all* the differences are, but weather is the major one, and that's a great feature if you live in areas where you deal with weather often or if you do lots of long x-cs. Of the times I've been in the right seat with my friend using his 396, aside from the weather, I haven't seen him do anything else with the 396 that the 296 doesn't do. I absolutely love my 296. The manual is not very helpful, but once you figure out how various features work, it's great. I had zero prior GPS experience, and I love how I can program in waypoints that aren't already in the database, program the route the night before the flight and save it and/or edit it for next time. On most screens, you can pick and choose what data YOU want it to display. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|