A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Changes in Instrument Proficiency Check Requirements



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old May 27th 04, 05:39 AM
Richard Kaplan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



"Teacherjh" wrote in message
...

The hood (badly) simulates IMC. How would you simulate a circling

approach?
Anything which works would be ok with me (including a more expensive

simulator,
or a real airplane). It is a task that should be tested.


There are two reasonably practical ways to simulate a circling approach in
an FTD or Advanced ATD, yet neither is "legal" for logging a circling
approach.

First, some devices (i.e. the Elite series Advanced ATD) allow the
instructor to switch the visuals between a left, forward, or right view at
the request of the pilot.

Second, an FTD with a moving map GPS, i.e. a Garmin 530, can display the
runway reasonably well enough to allow the pilot to maintain situational
awareness when not on final.

I think either of these techniques combined with night low IMC weather
conditions reasonably makes the point a pilot regarding the difficulty of
completing a low visibility circling approach.


No, of course not. But it should require a device that does what it needs

to
do. If you use a simulator, it should simulate all the tasks. If the


An FTD or Advanced ATD simulates all the tasks that were until recently
required on an IPC. What has changed is that the required tasks have now
been modified.

Historically very, very few simulators have been able to simulate "all" the
tasks. To this day many airline-quality true simulators only have night
visual displays with few if any ground references; such an advanced
simulator cannot be used for the very simple student pilot task of daytime
pilotage. Should we decide that such a simulator can no longer be used to
conduct an ATP 6-month line check? Would it be reasonable to add daytime
pilotage to the ATP line check and thus render the simulator incapable of
completing the task?

It's always the middle of the game.


True, but how much notification is reasonable?

I suspect we will all be required to have Mode S transponders someday but I
am quite sure there would be an uproar if today it were announced that they
are required by October... ditto for any major airplane hardware requirement
which has been phased in by the FAA.


--------------------
Richard Kaplan, CFII

www.flyimc.com


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Logging approaches Ron Garrison Instrument Flight Rules 109 March 2nd 04 05:54 PM
CFI logging instrument time Barry Instrument Flight Rules 21 November 11th 03 12:23 AM
Instrument Rating Ground School at Central Jersey Regional (47N) john price Instrument Flight Rules 0 October 29th 03 12:56 PM
Instrument Rating Ground School at Central Jersey Regional (47N) john price Instrument Flight Rules 0 October 12th 03 12:25 PM
Use of hand-held GPS on FAA check ride Barry Instrument Flight Rules 1 August 9th 03 09:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.