![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Teacherjh" wrote in message ... The hood (badly) simulates IMC. How would you simulate a circling approach? Anything which works would be ok with me (including a more expensive simulator, or a real airplane). It is a task that should be tested. There are two reasonably practical ways to simulate a circling approach in an FTD or Advanced ATD, yet neither is "legal" for logging a circling approach. First, some devices (i.e. the Elite series Advanced ATD) allow the instructor to switch the visuals between a left, forward, or right view at the request of the pilot. Second, an FTD with a moving map GPS, i.e. a Garmin 530, can display the runway reasonably well enough to allow the pilot to maintain situational awareness when not on final. I think either of these techniques combined with night low IMC weather conditions reasonably makes the point a pilot regarding the difficulty of completing a low visibility circling approach. No, of course not. But it should require a device that does what it needs to do. If you use a simulator, it should simulate all the tasks. If the An FTD or Advanced ATD simulates all the tasks that were until recently required on an IPC. What has changed is that the required tasks have now been modified. Historically very, very few simulators have been able to simulate "all" the tasks. To this day many airline-quality true simulators only have night visual displays with few if any ground references; such an advanced simulator cannot be used for the very simple student pilot task of daytime pilotage. Should we decide that such a simulator can no longer be used to conduct an ATP 6-month line check? Would it be reasonable to add daytime pilotage to the ATP line check and thus render the simulator incapable of completing the task? It's always the middle of the game. True, but how much notification is reasonable? I suspect we will all be required to have Mode S transponders someday but I am quite sure there would be an uproar if today it were announced that they are required by October... ditto for any major airplane hardware requirement which has been phased in by the FAA. -------------------- Richard Kaplan, CFII www.flyimc.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Logging approaches | Ron Garrison | Instrument Flight Rules | 109 | March 2nd 04 05:54 PM |
CFI logging instrument time | Barry | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | November 11th 03 12:23 AM |
Instrument Rating Ground School at Central Jersey Regional (47N) | john price | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | October 29th 03 12:56 PM |
Instrument Rating Ground School at Central Jersey Regional (47N) | john price | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | October 12th 03 12:25 PM |
Use of hand-held GPS on FAA check ride | Barry | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | August 9th 03 09:25 PM |