A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why are (some) delta wings stable without a horizontal tail?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5  
Old April 10th 06, 09:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why are (some) delta wings stable without a horizontal tail?


"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
k.net...

"xerj" wrote in message
...
Thanks Dudley.

Make sense now.

No sweat. Darrell hit on some of the operational issues for you. Also in
fighters like the 106 and the Mirage, you could grab a yard of stick above
corner, rotate the lift vector, and bleed the Ps down with the drag curve
so fast that overshoot became a real issue for a shooter sitting on a
tracking solution.
It was Lippitsch I think who pioneered the delta without a tail. The idea
was popular for a while, but the extremely high landing speeds made
handling the airplane a real challenge. The whole deal centered around the
trailing edge design. Putting the horizontal stab back on the airplane
(Mig 21/blown flaps etc) helped the low speed/angle of attack situation on
landings, but the delta remains even today as a huge induced drag machine
into the left side of the envelope.
Power control and front side/back side power curve issues on final are
still major areas of concern for the deltas.
Darrell knows......that arrowhead of an airplane he flew was one hell of a
piece of equipment :-))
Dudley Henriques


Yeah, Dudley, I was an instructor in the TB-58 towards the end and we
demonstrated high sink to the new pilots. We'd slow well below approach
speed in level flight and raise the nose to stay level. We'd slowly add
power up to 100% but stay out of afterburners. Pretty soon we'd hit high
drag/high sink and I'd have the student note his vertical speed. We
"looked" level but were descending at nearly 4,000 FPM. He could still
change the pitch and roll with apparently normal response but he couldn't
stop sinking until he could increase the speed. We practiced at medium
altitudes where you could lower the nose, accelerate and fly out of the
danger area. The main point of the exercise was to show how important it
was during approach to landing to keep the speed within normal boundaries.
On final approach there's not enough altitude to lower the nose and fly out
of it. If you ever got into high sink on final you'd have to light all
four afterburners and hope they all lit off. If one didn't light at that
very low speed you'd not have enough control to handle it. Especially if
it was an outboard engine that didn't light off.




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! Eliot Coweye Home Built 237 February 13th 06 03:55 AM
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? tom pettit Home Built 35 September 29th 05 02:24 PM
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
Delta Pilots End Era of Luxurious Pay Peter MacPherson Piloting 42 November 18th 04 05:46 AM
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk Jehad Internet Military Aviation 0 February 7th 04 04:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.