![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message k.net... "xerj" wrote in message ... Thanks Dudley. Make sense now. No sweat. Darrell hit on some of the operational issues for you. Also in fighters like the 106 and the Mirage, you could grab a yard of stick above corner, rotate the lift vector, and bleed the Ps down with the drag curve so fast that overshoot became a real issue for a shooter sitting on a tracking solution. It was Lippitsch I think who pioneered the delta without a tail. The idea was popular for a while, but the extremely high landing speeds made handling the airplane a real challenge. The whole deal centered around the trailing edge design. Putting the horizontal stab back on the airplane (Mig 21/blown flaps etc) helped the low speed/angle of attack situation on landings, but the delta remains even today as a huge induced drag machine into the left side of the envelope. Power control and front side/back side power curve issues on final are still major areas of concern for the deltas. Darrell knows......that arrowhead of an airplane he flew was one hell of a piece of equipment :-)) Dudley Henriques Yeah, Dudley, I was an instructor in the TB-58 towards the end and we demonstrated high sink to the new pilots. We'd slow well below approach speed in level flight and raise the nose to stay level. We'd slowly add power up to 100% but stay out of afterburners. Pretty soon we'd hit high drag/high sink and I'd have the student note his vertical speed. We "looked" level but were descending at nearly 4,000 FPM. He could still change the pitch and roll with apparently normal response but he couldn't stop sinking until he could increase the speed. We practiced at medium altitudes where you could lower the nose, accelerate and fly out of the danger area. The main point of the exercise was to show how important it was during approach to landing to keep the speed within normal boundaries. On final approach there's not enough altitude to lower the nose and fly out of it. If you ever got into high sink on final you'd have to light all four afterburners and hope they all lit off. If one didn't light at that very low speed you'd not have enough control to handle it. Especially if it was an outboard engine that didn't light off. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Delta Pilots End Era of Luxurious Pay | Peter MacPherson | Piloting | 42 | November 18th 04 05:46 AM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |