![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
None of those really solves the problem of cost and difficulty of
maintenance, though. The only thing a Super Bug really gives up is a long-range missile, but Phoenix was aging and an extended-range AIM-120 variant could probably be cobbled together in short order if it was really called for. On the other hand, it should be easier to keep more Super Bugs in the air over an extended period of time with less manpower exerted per airframe to make that happen, and if the internal fuel tankage isn't what the Tomcat could muster, the Super Bug can at least carry more external fuel stores without sacrificing missile capability (five tanks, two Sidewinders, and six AMRAAMs with two on the fuselage and four on dual-rails under the outer wing pylons). Tomcats couldn't even shoot AIM-120. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|