![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Haluza wrote:
The final OLC League rules were just posted to the OLC web site: ....snip One requirement of the OLC-League is that flights to be scored must take-off at the home airfield of the club. So each club must designate a home airfield for the OLC League competition. We are assuming this is the same as the home airfield of the club.... The OLC-League sounds great but this rule raises a few questions. My own club is a very active XC club but our home field is in a hilly region and it's quite difficult to carry out long or fast flights from this field. Much of our best XC is done from various camps held during the year at several other airfields. Why would flights carried out at these camps (organised and run by the club for many years) not count for Club points in the OLC-League? It's actually an academic question since my country's not on the list but I can't believe that our situation isn't also the case for a number of Euramerican clubs. For example, this rule restricts the benefits of the specially favourable Alpine conditions to those who have regular access to St Auban or Minden. Why shouldn't flights by North German or Ohio club members count when they fly in Spain or Arizona on holidays? I would have thought that the aim of the OLC-League was to encourage XC flying by more pilots at more clubs but this does the reverse. If you live near and fly with a club in a poor XC area, your club will never do well in the comp. No new members will be encouraged to take up XC since only the best three count from any club no matter how many fly. It also differs from the normal FAI framework. There's a great story on the MSC site about a Polish National record being set by a young woman at Minden. It only needed to be flown by a Pole to count. It didn't matter where it was flown. I've read the rationale on the OLC site. They explain that it's very easy to form an "OLC-Club" which would shift its flying according to the season. I think this is unlikely but their solution to this hypothetical problem ensures that a few clubs in favoured areas will probably dominate the competition. The restriction to only the best three flights from each club will pressure results even more the same way. As I see it, the departure point of a flight has more influence on the likelihood of a great XC flight than the weather. Think of this: hardly anybody lives in Omarama but it has as many glider pilots per square inch as anywhere in the world - and they're there most of the year. Here's another thought. If we can produce a handicap list for gliders, why not a handicap list for flying sites? That might make the OLC-League rule acceptable. Graeme Cant |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Announcing the 2006 Pennsylvania Region 3 OLC Championship | QT | Soaring | 1 | March 29th 06 03:51 PM |
24 Mar 2006 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | March 25th 06 02:23 AM |
2006 Region 3 Contest - August 27th thru Sept, 2nd, 2006 | Tim Hanke | Soaring | 0 | January 25th 06 10:20 PM |
Aviation Weather Workshop Locations for 2006! | scottd | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | December 10th 05 01:47 AM |
USA / CFIG Recertification Clinic Schedule / 2006 / SSF | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | November 29th 05 04:55 PM |