![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
5-4-24. Contact Approach
a. Pilots operating in accordance with an IFR flight plan, provided they are clear of clouds and have at least 1 mile flight visibility and can reasonably expect to continue to the destination airport in those conditions, may request ATC authorization for a contact approach. b. Controllers may authorize a contact approach provided: 1. The contact approach is specifically requested by the pilot. ATC cannot initiate this approach. EXAMPLE- Request contact approach. 2. The reported ground visibility at the destination airport is at least 1 statute mile. 3. The contact approach will be made to an airport having a standard or special instrument approach procedure. 4. Approved separation is applied between aircraft so cleared and between these aircraft and other IFR or special VFR aircraft. EXAMPLE- Cleared contact approach (and, if required) at or below (altitude) (routing) if not possible (alternative procedures) and advise. c. A contact approach is an approach procedure that may be used by a pilot (with prior authorization from ATC) in lieu of conducting a standard or special IAP to an airport. It is not intended for use by a pilot on an IFR flight clearance to operate to an airport not having a published and functioning IAP. Nor is it intended for an aircraft to conduct an instrument approach to one airport and then, when "in the clear," discontinue that approach and proceed to another airport. In the execution of a contact approach, the pilot assumes the responsibility for obstruction clearance. If radar service is being received, it will automatically terminate when the pilot is instructed to change to advisory frequency. Note that FLIGHT VISIBILITY of ONE MILE is required and the pilot determines flught visibility. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message nk.net... | | "Jim Macklin" wrote in message | news:4Tv%f.3147$8q.416@dukeread08... | | You can always request a contact approach and fly any | altitude and path including the normal VFR pattern and still | be "on an IFR clearance." | | | Well, you can always request a contact approach, but you can't always get | one. Clearance for a contact approach requires a reported ground visibility | of at least one mile. Not all airports have weather reporting. | | | | If you are working for an | operator who does not allow cancellation of IFR, then it is | up to the PIC to determine the method required to comply | with IAP and VFR traffic pattern. | | | Compliance with the "VFR traffic pattern" is not required in this case. | Review the regulation, before you get to " make all turns of that airplane | to the left", you have "unless otherwise authorized or required." If you're | on the VOR-A and intend to land on runway 16 compliance with the restriction | on circling east of the runway will require turns to the right | | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Circle to land question | A Lieberman | Instrument Flight Rules | 33 | May 24th 05 04:22 AM |
Confused about great circle navigation | xerj | Piloting | 7 | July 10th 04 05:38 PM |
R in a Circle (Airport Surveillance Radar) on VFR charts | Jeff Saylor | Piloting | 66 | May 12th 04 04:05 PM |
Defensive circle | Dave Eadsforth | Military Aviation | 23 | October 9th 03 06:13 PM |
NACO charts - why have a reference circle? | Bob Gardner | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | September 6th 03 01:15 PM |