![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Iraq is fly paper for the terrorists, they come and we kill
them. "Icebound" wrote in message ... | | "Jay Honeck" wrote in message | oups.com... | | Although I'm not in favor of nuking Iran, I must point out that you're | judging the results in Iraq with typical American impatience. | | The outcome of this war won't be known for decades. I believe history | will look favorably on the decision to intervene when we did -- as it | will when we are forced to do something in Iran. | | | | Sorry, Jay. | | The routing of the Taliban in Afghanistan: yes, history will look very | favourably. | | But the invasion of Iraq will be viewed as one of the worst decisions that a | President of the United States has ever made. Even if the eventual outcome | produces the most idyllic non-violent pro-western participatory democracy | that the world has ever seen... there is no way to tell whether that may not | have come about in time, anyway, from internal pressures of a disenchanted | populace, plus diplomatic pressures from a united world. | | But the negatives are pretty clear. Not the least of which is that.... | after being deprived of their Afghanistan training areas, ....(and with the | Arab countries united with the USA, however grudgingly, against Bin Laden | and his cronies)... that Al Qaeda had nowhere to go...they were being | dispersed to oblivion. | | The invasion of Iraq handed their followers a focus... a training-ground in | a country where they were not even previously welcome. Now after | 3-plus-years of battle-hardening they are dispersing again.... not to | oblivion, but to cause more havoc across the world, including back in | Afghanistan. | | --- | | It is interesting that we, the west, are making nice with Pakistan, who not | only *has* the bomb *already*, but is the source which sold nuclear secrets | to various not-so-savoury characters and countries. | | But we are rattling war-weapons at Iran who claim only to want electricity. | Who have agreed to UN IAEA inspections (although the west rejects that | because we want something more...???). | | The US, of all people, must know that citizens' pride is a very strong | emotion. Invasion of Iran for what they *Might* do, will make Iraq look | like a Sunday stroll in the park. If we agree to inspections and it proves | wrong, and Iran actually DOES build a bomb and actually DOES harm to | someone, the retaliatory world coalition would stop them permanently in six | days or less. | | The total damage will probably be considerable less than a protracted | pre-emption... like Iraq, where it will be six *years* or more. | | It amazes me that anybody can still think that we will drop a few bombs, | wipe out their nuclear capability, and that the war (and threat) is | magically "over"...that 60 million citizenry will automatically accepts our | interpretation of their governments' "obvious" misdeeds, and politely say | "thank you for bombing our homeland". | | Yes, there is the psychotic rhetoric of Ahmadinejad to fuel our fears. But | in 1956 Nikita Khrushchev beat his shoe on a United Nations table while | shouting "we will bury you" to the USA. I wonder if it would have been a | "better world" today if we had invaded or nuked the USSR back then?.?. | | --- | | I also find it intriguing that Second Amendment proponents at home, are | *not* "Second Amendment proponents" on the world stage. "It's okay to have | a gun, but only for me and my friends, and I am not so sure about the | friends". | | --- | | And finally... if Iran really just wants power, why doesn't the west save a | lot of money and trouble and just offer to BUILD the damn nuclear power | plants *for* them, no strings attached. It would cost a lot less than war, | in both money and bodies, and they would no longer have any excuse for their | own program. Think of it like good old fashioned American | litigation...sometimes its cheaper to settle than to go to court, even if | you are right. If they persisted with the program in spite of the offer, at | least you now have a *real* excuse. | | As a bonus for the west, it might be a small step from operating their | nuclear plants, to operating their oil plants. | | | | | | | | | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ethanol mogas | john smith | Owning | 16 | May 2nd 06 01:30 PM |
MoGas Long Term Test: 5000 gallons and counting... | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 82 | May 19th 05 02:49 PM |
MoGas Long Term Test: 5000 gallons and counting... | Jay Honeck | Owning | 87 | May 19th 05 02:49 PM |
Ethanol Powered Airplane Certified In Brazil | Victor | Owning | 4 | March 30th 05 09:10 PM |