A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

MoGas users: Ethanol replacing MTBE



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old May 1st 06, 01:51 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default MoGas users: Ethanol replacing MTBE

Iraq is fly paper for the terrorists, they come and we kill
them.



"Icebound" wrote in
message ...
|
| "Jay Honeck" wrote in message
|
oups.com...
|
| Although I'm not in favor of nuking Iran, I must point
out that you're
| judging the results in Iraq with typical American
impatience.
|
| The outcome of this war won't be known for decades. I
believe history
| will look favorably on the decision to intervene when we
did -- as it
| will when we are forced to do something in Iran.
|
|
|
| Sorry, Jay.
|
| The routing of the Taliban in Afghanistan: yes, history
will look very
| favourably.
|
| But the invasion of Iraq will be viewed as one of the
worst decisions that a
| President of the United States has ever made. Even if
the eventual outcome
| produces the most idyllic non-violent pro-western
participatory democracy
| that the world has ever seen... there is no way to tell
whether that may not
| have come about in time, anyway, from internal pressures
of a disenchanted
| populace, plus diplomatic pressures from a united world.
|
| But the negatives are pretty clear. Not the least of
which is that....
| after being deprived of their Afghanistan training areas,
....(and with the
| Arab countries united with the USA, however grudgingly,
against Bin Laden
| and his cronies)... that Al Qaeda had nowhere to go...they
were being
| dispersed to oblivion.
|
| The invasion of Iraq handed their followers a focus... a
training-ground in
| a country where they were not even previously welcome.
Now after
| 3-plus-years of battle-hardening they are dispersing
again.... not to
| oblivion, but to cause more havoc across the world,
including back in
| Afghanistan.
|
| ---
|
| It is interesting that we, the west, are making nice with
Pakistan, who not
| only *has* the bomb *already*, but is the source which
sold nuclear secrets
| to various not-so-savoury characters and countries.
|
| But we are rattling war-weapons at Iran who claim only to
want electricity.
| Who have agreed to UN IAEA inspections (although the west
rejects that
| because we want something more...???).
|
| The US, of all people, must know that citizens' pride is a
very strong
| emotion. Invasion of Iran for what they *Might* do, will
make Iraq look
| like a Sunday stroll in the park. If we agree to
inspections and it proves
| wrong, and Iran actually DOES build a bomb and actually
DOES harm to
| someone, the retaliatory world coalition would stop them
permanently in six
| days or less.
|
| The total damage will probably be considerable less than a
protracted
| pre-emption... like Iraq, where it will be six *years* or
more.
|
| It amazes me that anybody can still think that we will
drop a few bombs,
| wipe out their nuclear capability, and that the war (and
threat) is
| magically "over"...that 60 million citizenry will
automatically accepts our
| interpretation of their governments' "obvious" misdeeds,
and politely say
| "thank you for bombing our homeland".
|
| Yes, there is the psychotic rhetoric of Ahmadinejad to
fuel our fears. But
| in 1956 Nikita Khrushchev beat his shoe on a United
Nations table while
| shouting "we will bury you" to the USA. I wonder if it
would have been a
| "better world" today if we had invaded or nuked the USSR
back then?.?.
|
| ---
|
| I also find it intriguing that Second Amendment proponents
at home, are
| *not* "Second Amendment proponents" on the world stage.
"It's okay to have
| a gun, but only for me and my friends, and I am not so
sure about the
| friends".
|
| ---
|
| And finally... if Iran really just wants power, why
doesn't the west save a
| lot of money and trouble and just offer to BUILD the damn
nuclear power
| plants *for* them, no strings attached. It would cost a
lot less than war,
| in both money and bodies, and they would no longer have
any excuse for their
| own program. Think of it like good old fashioned American
| litigation...sometimes its cheaper to settle than to go to
court, even if
| you are right. If they persisted with the program in
spite of the offer, at
| least you now have a *real* excuse.
|
| As a bonus for the west, it might be a small step from
operating their
| nuclear plants, to operating their oil plants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ethanol mogas john smith Owning 16 May 2nd 06 01:30 PM
MoGas Long Term Test: 5000 gallons and counting... Jay Honeck Home Built 82 May 19th 05 02:49 PM
MoGas Long Term Test: 5000 gallons and counting... Jay Honeck Owning 87 May 19th 05 02:49 PM
Ethanol Powered Airplane Certified In Brazil Victor Owning 4 March 30th 05 09:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.