![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "Denny" said:
"OK, it's filed... Hayuv a nice day.", she chirped... Slight pause on my part (the deer in the headlights look, my son, DL, later dryly mentioned) as I was well into the role of mentor and smoothly showing my son how it is done by a pro I thought .... "Uhhh, I didn't get a squawk." "Oh, I can't give you a squawk, ATC will assign that when you open your flight plan." Most of this story seems to indicate that you expect a VFR flight plan to work exactly the same as an IFR flight plan. It never has, and post 9/11 it's been even worse for cross border operations. Even before 9/11, you *always* have had to open and close the VFR flight plan with FSS, and request flight following from ATC. They're separate functions. ROC Approach always insisted that you have a flight plan on file before they'd give you flight following, and when I'd mention that here people accused me of lying or being mistaken. Without the VFR flight plan, they'd refuse to hand you off but turn you lose and maybe give you a frequency to contact for the next facility. Even with the flight plan, you'd sometimes get turned loose. When NavCanada was just taking over in Canada, Toronto would refuse to take VFR hand-offs from Buffalo or Rochester, and you'd either have to dive beneath their airspace or go around. When I went to places in Canada outside of Toronto, it was nice because Canadian towers open and close VFR flight plans. But I never quite got the hang of getting flight following from Ottawa - they'd always just turn me lose and then I'd try to raise Wheeler Sack as I got closer to the border. I've been told that the secret is to file a "Controlled VFR" flight plan, but I've never tried it because I got my IFR rating before I got a chance. Post 9/11, you still have to be on a flight plan of some sort to cross the border, and now you have to be talking to ATC as well. So I just find it a ton easier to file IFR rather than deal with all "will he hand me off, or won't he, only his bartender knows for sure" crap. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ "Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea -- massive, difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind- boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it." - spaf (1992) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Impossibility of Flying Heavy Aircraft Without Training | Immanuel Goldstein | Piloting | 365 | March 16th 06 01:15 AM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Must the PLANE be IFR-equipped to fly over17,500? | john smith | Home Built | 11 | August 27th 04 02:29 AM |
ADV: CPA Mountain Flying Course 2004 Dates | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | February 13th 04 04:30 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |