![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 May 2006 11:42:18 +0200, Greg Farris wrote:
I made exactly the same transition some years ago - from a 172S to a 182S, and my impression is in some ways opposite to the others listed here. The 182S was the first constant-speed prop I had flown, and I found the plane took off like a rocket! That's true. At a climb out speed of 70 knots, it feels like it's almost on its tail. I love that feeling, but the visibility is lousy. Vy is 78 (at least in the older 182s I fly), so that's better anyway (why the POH has the 70-80 range I don't know). [...] I knew the plane was heavier, so I was ready for that. You know it, and you're ready for it. I knew about the CS prop, and had studied that too. I think I've also found that the 182 will sink faster in the flare. That calls for a slightly quicker flair. Some people use a little power in the flare to slow the sink, and that works. But I prefer to avoid that because I assume it'll cost me runway length. - Andrew |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GAO: Option of Upgrading Additional EA-6Bs Could Reduce Risk in Development of EA-18G. | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 28th 06 02:32 PM |
C172SP engine start with battery switch only? | Robert Winn | Piloting | 8 | April 13th 04 12:31 AM |
Cessna 182S flaps | EDR | Piloting | 7 | January 16th 04 02:37 AM |
1997 Cessna 182S | EDR | Piloting | 2 | December 28th 03 03:21 AM |
Upgrading System | Anthony Acri | Simulators | 1 | July 17th 03 03:18 AM |