![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Logajan wrote in news:Xns97D38A5FCB7F6JamesLLugojcom@
216.168.3.30: Skywise wrote: Hell, what's the purpose of this insane law, anyway? Got any info on that part? The alleged reasons are itemized in "480.315 Policy" of the relevant statutes, found he http://www.oregon.gov/OOHS/SFM/docs/...k/CardlockStat utes_Rules080505.pdf That these issues have been shown to be false or grossly exaggerated in 48 other states has not appeared to phase the legislature or allegedly Oregon voters (last time they were given the option to dump the law in 1982 the voters said no thanks). But getting back to aviation - at least pilots can now rest easy knowing they can fuel their own aircraft when landing in Oregon. Thank's for the link. My first thought at starting to read it was, "HA! What a ****ing joke!". I'm considering sending an email to the appropriate person in Oregon saying the same thing. ![]() Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ADIZ pilot's ticket revoked | A.Coleman | Piloting | 234 | May 30th 05 02:55 AM |
ntsb report | Peter Clark | Instrument Flight Rules | 38 | April 1st 05 03:18 AM |