![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have both the Themi and Winpilot Pro. When I'm not flying my glider into
the ground, I find that both of these devices generally work as advertised. They most often agree with each other too - - though not always. Also, in a compound thermal with several lift cores adjacent to one another, they are of no help in suggesting that the glider move to a stronger area in the complex, as may be suggested by looking at the overhead cloud structure. The Themi has one advantage over WPP, it remembers where thermals are for the return trip. And if you arrive at a different altitude the second time around, it accounts for that too. That said, if I already had WinPilot Pro, I wouldn't spend the money on a Themi unless I needed that unit's logger function. bumper wrote in message oups.com... At a fellow pilot's suggestion, for over a year I've been using Glide Navigator II's "tracks" feature to help center difficult thermals. It doesn't tell me where the best lift is but it does help me visualize the thermal and see where I am compared with the previous circles. More sophisticated soaring navigation software actually marks areas of stronger lift and may even offer recommendations: e.g., WinPilot Pro, SeeYou Mobile, and possibly others. I've stuck with GNII not only because I like it but also because I'm still running it on the old gray-scale Compaq 1550 and don't have one of the newer varios/flight computers that add airspeed and variometer data to the GPS sentences going into the PDA. I'll ignore the very real concern about whether this feature tends to make pilots look outside the cockpit even less than they already do. In my experience, those who commit this sin are the same pilots who fly their flight computers right into the ground when they accidentally set the arrival height to minus 500 ft. My question is do these features work well in WinPilot, etc.? Is the relative rate-of-climb information accurate; i.e., is the best lift displayed in the right place? What about the suggestions to shift the circle in a certain direction (e.g., the Themi device)? Chip Bearden ASW 24 "JB" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thermal History Software? | Gary Emerson | Soaring | 4 | April 19th 06 02:26 AM |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Free Flight Planning Software | Dean Wilkinson | Piloting | 20 | September 25th 04 03:38 AM |
Free Flight Planning Software | Dean Wilkinson | Products | 0 | September 18th 04 10:44 PM |
Next: Aviation Map software | Toks Desalu | Piloting | 5 | May 24th 04 07:55 PM |