![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Speculation: The training market is the 800lb gorilla in GA. Almost
every certified design is going to get a lot of business from schools and whatnot. This includes twins too, where people are always trying to get the coveted multi-engine ratings. Enter the Skymaster: It's a twin, which means it has the cost of a twin (in fuel and overhaul costs and insurance, etc). Unlike most other twins, though, when you do your multi training and checkride in it, you have a limitation in your logbook to inline multis, right? Eg, you can't go and fly a 310 without another checkride. With this in mind, I would guess that most schools, upon learning about the restrictions, passed on them because all those aspiring airline pilots wouldn't be interested in wasting time with inline multis. Basically, I'm guessing that safety benefits of an inline are overshadowed by the practical usefulness of the logged time towards an ATP (in the eyes of the schools and students, a significant market). /conjecture Thoughts? Ben Hallert PP-ASEL |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | November 4th 03 12:57 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |