A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12  
Old June 1st 06, 10:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why didn't the Cessna 337 make it?

As a multiengine instructor I would never allow a student to
use ONLY the EGT, RPM, CHT or other instrument to verify the
degree and actual failure of an engine. You must close the
throttle on the engine you think is dead, all the way [over
a period of a few seconds] to be sure you have properly
identified the failed engine and that it is in fact really
dead and not just sick. If the yaw changes when you get the
MAP back to 20 inches, that means you have a sick engine and
you don't want to shut it all the way down [unless it is on
fire] at 100,200 or 300 feet. At 500 feet you probably have
circling minimums so maybe you'll prefer to secure a sick
engine, but any examiner I've ever heard of would fail a
student who used the unreliable instruments to identify,
verify and then feather an engine.


--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P

--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
some support
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm
See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties.


"Michael" wrote in
message
ups.com...
| Jim Macklin wrote:
| Get a better and more qualified instructor. 100 hours
is
| very little time in a particular model, but this guy is
| either ignorant or you didn't understand him.
|
| Actually, you're displaying the ignorance here.
|
| The syncrophaser is used to get both props turning at
the
| same speed and with the blades in phase to reduce noise.
|
| Correct, that is the primary purpose. However, its range
of command is
| limited - generally 25-50 RPM. Many also have an
indicator (the needle
| the instructor is talking about) which tells you which way
to make the
| adjustment to bring the props within the range of command
of the
| synchrophaser. Since the prop governors used in piston
airplanes are
| proportional-only controllers (no integral component) the
RPM on the
| failed engine WILL drop - and it will drop by enough to
take it out of
| the range of command, though not enough to be obvious (or
even
| noticeable) on the average GA tach. In that case, the
needle will
| become an effective indicator not only than an engine has
failed, but
| which one.
|
| In
| any multiengine aircraft, you identify a failed engine
in
| positive steps. The problem with the in-line airplanes
is
| that only reduced take-off performance (reduced climb)
| alerts the pilot to an engine failure.
|
| Only if he ingores the information provided by the
synchrophaser.
|
| Michael
|


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! Enea Grande Aviation Marketplace 1 November 4th 03 12:57 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.