![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob,
Was this a center or approach control facility and more specifically, was the weather info display primary or NEXRAD? If NEXRAD, did they discuss the amount of delay in the weather info on the controller's display? I'm wondering if it is significantly shorter? I know the satellite broadcast distribution adds some additional delay, but as I undersrand it, NEXRAD radar systems take a few minutes to build the composite view from several sweeps. Point is, the controller's display may be a few minutes old as well. Also, as you point out, the weather chances quickly and the radar is only showing precip. Thus, it is not showing the radid air currents of a developing storm. Until you have experienced being sucked up into a radily developing convective storm by flying through an area that your StrikeFinder and ATC agreed was the best path, you don't fully appreciate how danerous this type of weather can be. I second your recommendation to stay well clear of this type of weather. Ronnie "Bob Gardner" wrote in message . .. The first thing you need to understand is that the weather you see on the 396 is several minutes old...possibly as much as eleven minutes. So you need to watch the display and figure out which way the echoes are going, and plan on passing them on the upwind side. Then you need to realize that radar reflects only decent size rain droplets, not vertical currents, not the tops of clouds, not turbulence. Bottom line is: Stay well clear of anything green...yellow and red go without saying. If you have to get into the green, make the incursion as short as possible. Saw a revealing presentation at a NATCA controller's conference. They showed a slide with several large cells being displayed, and indicated the position of a 172 when the scenario began. The pilot told the controller that if he could have a certain heading, he would be clear of the cell he saw on his screen and could proceed to his destination. Unfortunately, by the time he got to the geographical area which was nice and clear on his cockpit display at the time he asked for the heading, the cell had moved directly into his path with predictable results. The message to the controllers in attendance was "What the pilot sees in the cockpit and real life are two different things." Bob Gardner "Dan" wrote in message oups.com... For those of you with a Garmin 396, how do you avoid dangerous weather, avoid yellow and steer clear of the lightning strike indications? I am considering the purchase of one and am wondering how to use the info safely, but yet with the maximum utility. Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Amateur Review of the Garmin GPSMAP 296 GPS | Rhett | Piloting | 10 | March 23rd 05 01:16 AM |
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) | Jon Woellhaf | Piloting | 12 | September 4th 04 11:55 PM |
Garmin 430 Terrain Avoidance | endre | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | July 22nd 04 03:41 AM |
FA: WEATHER FLYING: A PRACTICAL BOOK ON FLYING | The Ink Company | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 5th 03 12:07 AM |