![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Smith wrote:
In article .com, wrote: Now let me ask a question. What if ATC clears you direct to the VOR and then clears you for the "straight-in" approach? Isn't the controller's instruction in conflict with the AIM? Who wins, hypothetically speaking (say you can't contact him for clarification)? I had almost exactly this same situation happen the other day with NY Approach. We were coming into White Plains (HPN) from the north, IFR. Controller gave us something like, "direct FARAN, cleared ILS-16". FARAN's not an IAF, the route from FARAN inbound is not marked NoPT, we hasn't giving us vectors. By strict interpretation of the rules, he gave us a bum clearance. On the other hand, not only did I know that he wanted us to fly the approach straight-in, but there was no practical reason why anything else would make any sense, so we did it. The bottom line is that the AIM just hasn't caught up with real life. Not exactly. The following was added to the AIM recently. Note that it is limited to RNAV IAPs. There were lenghty discussions within FAA and with industry. It was at first proposed to permit the practice for all instrument approach procedures with an intermediate fix, and limit it to GPS or advanced RNAV aircraft. FAA's ATC management nixed the idea for conventional, ground-based IAPs. So, it isn't really the AIM not staying up with the "real world," it's the real world inventing its own rules. 5-4-7 i. ATC may clear aircraft that have filed an Advanced RNAV equipment suffix to the intermediate fix when clearing aircraft for an instrument approach procedure. ATC will take the following actions when clearing Advanced RNAV aircraft to the intermediate fix: 1. Provide radar monitoring to the intermediate fix. 2. Advise the pilot to expect clearance direct to the intermediate fix at least 5 miles from the fix. NOTE- This is to allow the pilot to program the RNAV equipment to allow the aircraft to fly to the intermediate fix when cleared by ATC. 3. Assign an altitude to maintain until the intermediate fix. 4. Insure the aircraft is on a course that will intercept the intermediate segment at an angle not greater than 90 degrees and is at an altitude that will permit normal descent from the intermediate fix to the final approach fix. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Change in AIM wording concerning procedure turn | Kris Kortokrax | Instrument Flight Rules | 208 | October 14th 05 12:58 AM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
Procedure Turn | Bravo8500 | Instrument Flight Rules | 65 | April 22nd 04 03:27 AM |
Unusual Procedure at DFW | Toks Desalu | Piloting | 9 | December 17th 03 05:27 PM |
Instrument Approaches and procedure turns.... | Cecil E. Chapman | Instrument Flight Rules | 58 | September 18th 03 10:40 PM |