![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Or is the Navy really worried about Sub-launched SAM's?
The answer to both questions is probably "yes." Why? So far nobody has fielded a sub-launched SAM system, and given the difficulties found in the experiments (mast mounted blowpipe, for example), it's unlikely that anybody is going to try again in the near future. There used to be a photo of a purported SUBSAM in the sail of a Kilo. Other units were rumored to have it. I doubt it would be all that useful, but I wouldn't want to be two MAD runs into my attack and find out we were wrong about whether or not the system exists. The "mine"-type SAM as described by another poster is, in my opinion, a viable alternative that fits neatly with a suite of other countermeasures. While the helo is stuck in a dip, their acoustic signatures are detectible for miles and this could be exploited. I like the idea of a high-alt drop on an unalerted sub, but I cringe to think of the IFF issues. A torp can't tell a cowboy from an indian. v/r Gordon VS-31, HS-5, HSL-33, CTG 72.8 (Diego Garcia ASWOC), COMASWWINGPAC plus a couple other ASW units |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
spaceship one | Pianome | Home Built | 169 | June 30th 04 05:47 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |
High Altitude operations (Turbo charge???) | Andre | Home Built | 68 | July 11th 03 11:59 PM |