![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:47:36 -0400, Vince wrote:
Ed Rasimus wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:11:33 -0700, "Leadfoot" wrote: We were prepared to fight as long as it took, IF--repeat IF--the give-up rather than fight crowd in the US would have stopped distracting the politicians so that we could have won. So we could still be there today, eh? No, we would have been out by 1968. Review the effect on "negotiations" of the period 18-29 December 1972 for a concrete example. Ed, with all due respect the "dolchstoss" theory didn't wash then and it doesn't wash now. No "dolchstoss" involved here. There was certainly no knife in the back in '64-'68. We had the military power to impose our will if we had the political will to do so. For whatever reason our proxies , the south Vietnamese , would not fight with the same intensity as the Russian and Chinese proxies, the north Vietnamese. And, we were woefully ignorant of culture other than our own. The agrarian south was not quite as easily mobilized as the industrialized (and hence Marxist prone) north. Yet we could have "contained" the communist threat readily had we not gradually fell victim to political posturing and pacifism at home. Throw in a draft, a Spock-raised generation with expectations of a life of privilege, a rising expectation of equality for our minorities, and a propensity increasingly for politicians to pander for votes rather than doing what is arguably painful but better for the nation in the long run. Since both sides had nuclear weapons we were constrained to fight a limited war. As a result "we" could not win. Only the south Vietnamese could win and they did not want to fight. Exactly the issue. We were still woefully uncertain of how to keep wars "limited" and how to stem escalation. This was obvious to the world in the late 60s. Up until that line we had significant agreement. Not much of all of this was obvious to the world in the late '60s. And, I would forecast that in 2040, not much of what will be then obvious about jihadists and dealing with them will have been known now. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" www.thunderchief.org www.thundertales.blogspot.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
God Honest | Naval Aviation | 2 | July 24th 03 04:45 AM |