![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 03:55:18 -0500, Chris W wrote in
X%Nmg.58007$9c6.31230@dukeread11: The FAA accepts the Academy of Model Aeronautics definition of a recreational model as weighing 55 lbs (dry, I think) and operating under 400' altitude (a provision busted every day by all kinds of RC aircraft). In an other post you stated the 400 ft AGL rule was only when you were with in 3 miles of an airport. I was wrong. I heard it through the grapevine at my club, which operates fairly close to Niagara Falls International Airport (IAG) and the Niagara Falls Air Reserve Base, which is on the other side of the runways. It's 4.7 miles by car from the entrance of IAG to the parking lot at our field. As the crow flies, we might be right on the three-mile boundary, depending on how the airport's air space is defined. http://local.google.com/local?saddr=IAG+-+Niagara+Falls+Intl+Airport+%4043.099339,-78.945076&daddr=3900+Witmer+Rd,+Niagara+Falls,+NY+ 14305&f=d&hl=en&ie=UTF8&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=41.411029,67.324219&om=1 The same in a shorter format: http://tinyurl.com/nudjs We've heard that the radar operators at IAG can see some of the larger models at our field on their screens. I don't know how credible that report is. We had a couple of guys from the AF Reserve in our club, and I think they knew some of the controllers. Looking at the FAA documents, it seems that the 400' altitude is a universal restriction and not just applicable to sites within three miles of airports. We see lots of aircraft flying in and out of IAG. Fortunately, we're not lined up with either runway and haven't yet had any difficulties seeing and avoiding the full-scale traffic. Some helicopters come over the field at a fairly low level from time to time and perhaps once a year we might see a low-flying GA aircraft. If we stuck to the 400' ceiling and full-scale pilots maintained 500' AGL, there would be plenty of clearance. I don't know anyone in the club who has an altimeter of any sort, let alone telemetry to transmit the information back to the ground, so I'm just guessing about how high our planes fly. Marty |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cessna Glare Shield Cover | Al Gilson | Owning | 4 | March 21st 06 03:04 AM |
Musings on SOARING cover photos | Ray Lovinggood | Soaring | 19 | March 8th 05 02:30 AM |
Minor changes to USA FAR's 2005 | Burt Compton | Soaring | 0 | December 20th 04 10:24 PM |
This week's AW&ST: apparently THAAD will have some ABM (as in anti- *ICBM*) capability. | Scott Ferrin | Military Aviation | 29 | August 31st 04 04:20 AM |
Full airplane cover? | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 4 | May 5th 04 04:33 PM |