![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't want to be too negative but could I suggest that if you are
struggling with these relatively fundamental issues that such a project might be a little beyond you. These are not issues for someone without aerodynamic knowledge and what you describe is certainly not a design that is likely to be successful for a first time amateur designer. However let me give you a little insight into how to tackle the problem. Yes you could develop your own theory based on biplane type theory (i.e. a bound vortex respresenting each wing) and use this to predict the flow field. Any number of aerodynamics texts will give you the basic theory but you will need to extend that for your application. However I wouldn't bother with this with the computational tools available. Just get a Vortex lattice code such as the NASA VLM code or Drela's AVL (or better still a panel code such as PMARC or Peter Garrisons CMARC) and use this. Such an approach is far more accurate and someone who knows what they were doing would have a good feel for the issues and probably fix most of the major problems in less than a days work. However please be careful there are a lot of traps for new players even with these sorts of tools. Don't treat programs like this as a balck box .. try to understand what is going on inside them and what the limitations are. Once you have done your computer analysis build a large scale model and go and fly it before you waste time building the full size airplane. "pTooner" wrote in message ... Firstly, I am new here although I've been reading for a few days. For anyone with more knowledge than I, I keep considering building a small 4 wing aircraft. Not stacked, but two up front and two in the rear. I have read frequently of problems supposedly resulting from interference of the airflow between wings, but I can't seem to find anything very specific. I'm fairly confident that interference between the front wings (or rear) can be minimized by reasonable spacing and differing dihedral. I'm not sure what the effect of the airflow coming off the front wings will have on the rear set. I don't know whether I could remove most of the problem by having one set considerably higher (how much?) than the other set or if it is reasonable to have them on more or less the same height. The reason for the concept is trying to get a wingspan small enough to fit into a normal garage and conceivably take off and land from streets and highways. I visualise something in a two place plane that would fall into something of the appeal category of a motorcycle or small sports car. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Gerry |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thrusting or Sucking (where's Howard Stern when we need him.) | Ken Kochanski (KK) | Soaring | 37 | January 14th 06 09:51 AM |
ANG Woman Wing Commander Doesn't See Herself as Pioneer, By Master Sgt. Bob Haskell | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | March 18th 04 08:40 PM |
Wing tip stalls | mat Redsell | Soaring | 5 | March 13th 04 05:07 PM |
Can someone explain wing loading? | Frederick Wilson | Home Built | 4 | September 10th 03 02:33 AM |
Wing Extensions | Jay | Home Built | 22 | July 27th 03 12:23 PM |