![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"pTooner" wrote in message
... "Drew Dalgleish" wrote in message ... Even if everything works just the way you dream it will how will you see where you're going? You are assuming a far more complete design than actually exists, but I don't see why that should be a problem. Gerry I am fairly certain that tandem biplane designs existed in the early days--in addition to the obvious case of the Wright Flyer. However, I will second the suggestion to stay with one of the various folding wing designs. Also, unless you are *very* masochistic, you probably won't fly very ofter if you also have to tow the aircraft to and from the airport, so the ability to be towed at highway speeds (or even street speeds) may not be as usefull as the ease of folding and unfolding the wings. I would suggest asking around your local airport(s) regarding the storage cost for a folding wing aircraft--you may be able to share part of a hangar or even get a reasonable deal from a maintenance facility if they have permission to move the plane out of the way when they need the workspace. Also, the way Tee-hangars are constructed at some airports, there may be a half hangar on the end of each row--and a folding wing airplane would only need about half of a half hangar! BTW, depending on the size of the Tee hangars on the row, you might be able to nose a VariEze or even a LongEze into a half hangar and still share the back part of the hangar for storage or office space--depending on the rules at your airport. Also the Nesmith Cougar has a folding wing, and if you are of very small stature there is the Stits Playmate. I hope this helps Peter "pTooner" wrote in message . .. Firstly, I am new here although I've been reading for a few days. For anyone with more knowledge than I, I keep considering building a small 4 wing aircraft. Not stacked, but two up front and two in the rear. I have read frequently of problems supposedly resulting from interference of the airflow between wings, but I can't seem to find anything very specific. I'm fairly confident that interference between the front wings (or rear) can be minimized by reasonable spacing and differing dihedral. I'm not sure what the effect of the airflow coming off the front wings will have on the rear set. I don't know whether I could remove most of the problem by having one set considerably higher (how much?) than the other set or if it is reasonable to have them on more or less the same height. The reason for the concept is trying to get a wingspan small enough to fit into a normal garage and conceivably take off and land from streets and highways. I visualise something in a two place plane that would fall into something of the appeal category of a motorcycle or small sports car. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Gerry |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thrusting or Sucking (where's Howard Stern when we need him.) | Ken Kochanski (KK) | Soaring | 37 | January 14th 06 09:51 AM |
ANG Woman Wing Commander Doesn't See Herself as Pioneer, By Master Sgt. Bob Haskell | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | March 18th 04 08:40 PM |
Wing tip stalls | mat Redsell | Soaring | 5 | March 13th 04 05:07 PM |
Can someone explain wing loading? | Frederick Wilson | Home Built | 4 | September 10th 03 02:33 AM |
Wing Extensions | Jay | Home Built | 22 | July 27th 03 12:23 PM |