![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Tomblin wrote:
As a former surveyor, I can tell you that the altitude requirements for surveying are a lot more precise than for aviation - if my bridge abutment is built 2 feet high, I'm getting fired. If my plane is 2 feet high, nobody is going to notice. Looks as if I'm missing something central here, as usual ![]() If there is a 4-hour flight that passes over some 10 waypoints and if the FMGS keeps getting data that's off by 50 meters or so, am I to understand that the aircraft will still make heading changes, etc. that'd be in accordance with the programmed flight plan and that none of the waypoints will be missed or indeed the final destination precisely arrived at? And someone mentioned an acceptable accuracy of 0.1 foot in property surveying. If surveyors in my industry had that much latitude, there'd be a lot of equipment skids that'd get installed quite inappropriately, with lots of patched modifications thereon ![]() Ramapriya |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Airmens' Freedoms Threatened by Harsh Congressional Proposals | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 24 | July 29th 05 06:15 PM |
Aviation Books&CD Roms FS | [email protected] | Home Built | 0 | April 10th 05 10:29 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Home Built | 3 | May 14th 04 11:55 AM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Owning | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |