![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . net,
"Tom Conner" wrote: "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message oups.com... I read somewhere that NetJets lost $143M in 2005. I always felt that offering fractional ownership of a plane for business purposes was not a sustainable business model. Corporate private flying is primarily ego driven (must have plane - makes me look important), not business driven. For most companies it is an unnecessary expense, so they will eventually drop it. The next aviation business failure appears to be the idea that very light jets can be used as business transportation between small airports. Maybe, maybe not. The next few years will tell. In some cases, perhaps. But in most cases, business is done face to face. Corporate/private aviation is the only way to assure privacy and timely contact. Airlines and their schedules are too unreliable. Corporate executives that have the authority to make deals happen are too valuable, highly compensated and their time is too valuable to have them sitting around an airline gate where they can be recognized, waiting for a plane that may or may not arrive and depart on time. I worked for NetJets 12 years ago as a dispatcher. I saw where jets went and who was onboard. I knew who was going, but not who they were meeting. It was only after a deal was reported in the WSJ that I learned who the target in a merger/acquisition was. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
resume flying after 25 year layoff | David Banahan | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | September 21st 04 06:18 PM |