![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You are correct. By the time the B-58 became operational the Russian radar
and missile defense systems improved to the point that high altitude, mach 2, attacks would have been suicide. The operational tactics changed to high subsonic low altitude attack which made the mach 2 capability of the B-58 relatively unusable for combat. All the design features necessary for mach 2 flight such as the narrow fuselage made it impractical to add terrain avoidance radar for IFR low altitude. We practiced our low altitude high speed tactics in Oil Burner routes (now Olive Branch) at 600 knots on the deck. Great sport. -- Darrell R. Schmidt B-58 Hustler History: (see below) http://members.cox.net/dschmidt1/ wrote in message ups.com... Hi Darrel Darrell S wrote: If you want to see and read more about the Hustler, click on the link to my B-58 web site, below. Don't forget to sign the guest book. The More B-58 Pictures Annex link takes you to 3 more pages of pictures and text. Darrell R. Schmidt B-58 Hustler History: (see below) http://members.cox.net/dschmidt1/ Here's another interesting link, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-58_Hustler As I understand it, the B58 was a high speed - high altitude bomber that entered service about Mar/15/1960, with nil stealth capability. Gary Power's U2 was shot down May/1/1960, and had some stealth paint, that the Ruskies managed to circumvent. So 2 months after entering service, the B58 became a *low altitude penetration* bomber, with enough range for a one way trip into the USSR, effectively rendering it a kamikaze bomber. I think the crews knew that and it's their courage that helped keep us safe during the transition to ICBM's. IMO it was as sexy as anything that flew but it was not a good warplane because it was difficult to adapt, while the B52 could carry stand-off weapons and make it home, though in hindsight, it filled a vital deterrence gap in the early 1960's, that was equivalent to the B52 swarm, depending on gravity bombs. Regards Ken |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|