A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

no instrument flight



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12  
Old July 9th 06, 06:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bill Daniels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 687
Default no instrument flight - angle of attack


"Don Johnstone" wrote in message
...
At 06:42 08 July 2006, G L I D E R S T U D wrote:

Yaw sting....if you cant feel your body sliding left
or right when your
uncoordinated, you should probably relax some, because
you are way too
uptight. But then again one of my coaches said I was
too relaxed. On
that note my Discus 2ax didn't have a yaw sting, and
my Nimbus 3
doesn't have one either, and I probably won't get it
'fixed' before the
Opens. I fly in the mountains and I don't feel that
it is hazardous.
Plus that sting is way too much drag.

I defy anyone to 'feel' the tiny amount of yaw that
a yaw string will indicate. The drag created by even
the largest piece of wool will be very small compared
to even a small amout of yaw in straight and level
flight. A 'T&S' ball is just not sensitive enough and
the yaw string has the advantage of being in your eye
line, you don't have to go heads down to see it. To
fly efficiently in a big winged glider is is even more
essential as even tiny amoutns of control differences
are magnified with the addition leverage of long wings.


To Don Johnstone - Yep!

The weather is doing something it hasn't done in quite a while - raining -
therefore, I'm spending the weekend indoors. This has led me to research a
few ideas that I had set aside. One of them is an angle of attack indicator
for gliders.

Any reading of accident reports will quickly lead one to the conclusion that
pilots don't pay enough attention to AOA. No matter how hard AOA is
hammered into a students brain, a few months after their checkride, they
just watch the ASI. Some of them are involved in stall/spin accidents.

AOA indicators have long been essential to the safe operation of large
aircraft so, now that electronics are cheap, why not gliders too? Gliders
spend a lot of time flying near the stall AOA so we shoud be especially
interested in an AOA indicator.

So, how do we measure AOA? The traditional nose boom pitch vane is too
fragile for gliders but there is another way to get AOA data. Companies
like Masi make a simple AOA probes. See:
http://www.cgmasi.com/aviation/index.html

The Masi probe computes AOA from the pressure difference between two
pressure ports at 45 degrees to the airflow. Could the same be done with
pressure ports located on upper and lower nose? I think so. An inexpensive
differential pressure sensor and a bit of electronics driving an LED
lightbar plus a calibration proceedure would do it.

The calilbration procedure would be simple since we are only interested in
three AOA's - Stall, Minimum sink, and Best L/D. These would be very
helpful when flying gliders with a wide range of wing loadings. The min
sink AOA would be particularly helpful when flying at steep bank angles.

Gliders with flaps would have to repeat the calibration procedure for each
flap setting of interest - those being approach flaps and thermalling flaps.
Flap setting would have to be sent to the AOA conputer.

Any gadgeteers out there interested in making a few bucks awhile maybe
saving a few lives?

Bill Daniels


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
question about instrument proficiency check Sylvain Instrument Flight Rules 14 October 20th 05 09:11 AM
CRS: V-22 Osprey Tilt-Rotor Aircraft Mike Naval Aviation 0 October 14th 05 08:14 PM
NTSB: USAF included? Larry Dighera Piloting 10 September 11th 05 10:33 AM
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk Jehad Internet Military Aviation 0 February 7th 04 04:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.