![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
syoun10 wrote:
I have often wondered about what the author calls "high parasitic drag approach". Of course, it should never happen... but IF one found oneself very high on final I have always thought the best strategy would be to pull full airbrake, slip as much as possible and then dive as fast as placarded limits allow. Drag increases with the square of speed, so this should get you down with the steepest descent. In this scenario you should bleed off speed to normal approach speed before getting into ground effect. snip My experience and thinking process are probably derived from hang-gliding where there are no spoilers or flaps and you can't consistantly slip. Increasing the speed on final is the recommended way of steepening the approach, in fact it is the ONLY way. I'm not sure why this experience would not translate to sailplanes. snip It does translate to sailplanes. I did not see the article, so I don't know about the "high parasitic drag" approach referred to, but I often do an extreme version of this with a very high approach, full flap, full spoiler, and a tail chute. In this configuration, I can just point the nose at the round-out point, and the airspeed will remain stable, even at an approach angle approaching 1:1. At steep pitch angles, the glide geometry changes (e.g. lift is no longer equal to weight). So there is some advantage to doing this, if it is done properly. The normal procedure for using a tail chute for a short field landing over an obstacle is to make the approach just clearing the obstacle, then pitch down sharply and deploy the chute to get down as close to the approach end as possible. One thing, you do have to be careful to round out properly. If you do it too high, airspeed will bleed off quickly, and you could stall. If you do it too low, you may not have enough room to complete the roundout before the ground comes up to simite thee. So this is a critical maneuver. Now there are only a handful of gliders equipped with a chute, so this is not generally applicable. The point is that if you have enough drag, it can be done. IIRC the Grob 103 manual actually says that it is permissible to either use the brakes to control glide path and pitch to control airspeed, or to use pitch to control glide path and brakes to control airspeed. But the G103 has very powerful brakes. So I have always taught only to use pitch for airspeed and brakes (and slip) to control glide path. This method works with all gliders, even those without good brakes (it also applies to airplanes using the throttle in place of the brakes). And it does not require as much skill as the other method. As long as it is done properly, there is no need for the other method, except possibly for landing in a small field with a big obstacle. But this should only arise if you are flying aggressive cross country, and you should not be doing that until you are more skilled. A steep approach is especially unnecessary for landing at an airport without obstructions (on the approach end). And it won't be very effective without deploying the dive brakes, especially with the wheel retracted. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Video with some interesting thoughts about soaring from Bob Wander. | Stewart Kissel | Soaring | 0 | May 2nd 06 11:45 PM |
US SSA-OLC League new for Summer 2006 Season! | Doug Haluza | Soaring | 20 | April 26th 06 03:54 PM |
Introducing NJ's Newest Soaring Club! | Jim Buckridge | Piloting | 2 | February 22nd 05 04:07 PM |
Soaring Seminar - March 19th - ChicagoLand Glider Council | ContestID67 | Soaring | 4 | January 6th 05 11:28 PM |