![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The USAF terps guy Timothy Lovell sent John Haggerty (FAA terps guy) a
response to his query about the question I asked here, about the odd step-down on the LOC vs LOC/DME versions of this approach. For those not playing along at home, the LOC has a MDA of 900 feet, and the LOC/DME has an MDA of 700 feet with a step-down fix 2.7 DME from the VORTAC. http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/0410/00447I23.PDF The odd thing about the approach is that if you're doing the LOC/DME, then before the step down, you can't descend to 900 feet like if you were doing a straight LOC, but only to 1160'. I'll cut and paste his full answer here, but the executive summary is that they put the step down to "provide a constant descent rate on the procedure". Weird, eh? I don't see how that stops you from doing a dive and drive to 1160, then another to 700 myself, but that's just me. Oh, and the other question people had, about why the missed approach says "tracking 228" instead of "fly heading 228" or "tracking ILS BC" - that's just the way the USAF does things. Ok, here's the response: The LOC RWY 23 portion of the published KCEF ILS RWY 23 has a step down fix to avoid terrain (544'MSL) with an adverse assumption of 100' trees growing on it at N421439.00 W072827.00. This terrain gives you the MDA for the S-LOC 23 of 544'(terrain)+100'(tree)+250'(Required Obstacle Clearance)=894'=900'MDA. The published Step Down Fix (SDF) altitude of at or above 1160' on the S-LOC/DME 23 is not only for terrain avoidance, but to provide a constant descent rate on the procedure (FAF to SDF 379.81FPM/3.58 degrees, SDF to RWY 366.81 FPM/3.45 degrees). Were the SDF altitude purely for terrain avoidance the SDF altitude would be 900'. Having said all of that this procedure will change soon with the implementation of new AF software and the corresponding criteria changes. The SDF will move out to CEF 3DME and be raised to 1240', this altitude raise will ensure that an aircraft executing a circling approach will not descend below the highest circling MDA inadvertently. To answer the last part of your question AF criteria requires departure procedures and missed approach instructions to read track and not heading. The logic behind this is that an instrument procedure is built along a specific ground track to be flown and not a heading. The procedure track does not take in to account wind drift, this responsibility is placed upon the pilot. The AF trains its pilots very specifically to fly tracks not headings on departure and or missed approach. I hope this answers yours and everyone else's questions. Tim Tim Lovell Air Force Reserve Command, Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS) Manager -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ C isn't that hard: void (*(*f[])())() defines f as an array of unspecified size, of pointers to functions that return pointers to functions that return void. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 40 | October 3rd 08 03:13 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 1st 04 02:31 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | September 2nd 04 05:15 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | May 1st 04 07:29 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | April 5th 04 03:04 PM |