A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Answer on CEF ILS RWY 23 questions



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old October 14th 04, 01:06 AM
Paul Tomblin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Answer on CEF ILS RWY 23 questions

The USAF terps guy Timothy Lovell sent John Haggerty (FAA terps guy) a
response to his query about the question I asked here, about the odd
step-down on the LOC vs LOC/DME versions of this approach. For those not
playing along at home, the LOC has a MDA of 900 feet, and the LOC/DME has
an MDA of 700 feet with a step-down fix 2.7 DME from the VORTAC.
http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/0410/00447I23.PDF

The odd thing about the approach is that if you're doing the LOC/DME, then
before the step down, you can't descend to 900 feet like if you were doing
a straight LOC, but only to 1160'. I'll cut and paste his full answer
here, but the executive summary is that they put the step down to "provide
a constant descent rate on the procedure". Weird, eh? I don't see how
that stops you from doing a dive and drive to 1160, then another to 700
myself, but that's just me.

Oh, and the other question people had, about why the missed approach says
"tracking 228" instead of "fly heading 228" or "tracking ILS BC" - that's
just the way the USAF does things.

Ok, here's the response:
The LOC RWY 23 portion of the published KCEF ILS RWY 23 has a step
down fix to avoid terrain (544'MSL) with an adverse assumption of 100'
trees growing on it at N421439.00 W072827.00. This terrain gives you the
MDA for the S-LOC 23 of 544'(terrain)+100'(tree)+250'(Required Obstacle
Clearance)=894'=900'MDA. The published Step Down Fix (SDF) altitude of at
or above 1160' on the S-LOC/DME 23 is not only for terrain avoidance, but
to provide a constant descent rate on the procedure (FAF to SDF
379.81FPM/3.58 degrees, SDF to RWY 366.81 FPM/3.45 degrees). Were the SDF
altitude purely for terrain avoidance the SDF altitude would be 900'.
Having said all of that this procedure will change soon with the
implementation of new AF software and the corresponding criteria changes.
The SDF will move out to CEF 3DME and be raised to 1240', this altitude
raise will ensure that an aircraft executing a circling approach will not
descend below the highest circling MDA inadvertently.

To answer the last part of your question AF criteria requires
departure procedures and missed approach instructions to read track and
not heading. The logic behind this is that an instrument procedure is
built along a specific ground track to be flown and not a heading. The
procedure track does not take in to account wind drift, this
responsibility is placed upon the pilot. The AF trains its pilots very
specifically to fly tracks not headings on departure and or missed
approach.

I hope this answers yours and everyone else's questions.

Tim


Tim Lovell
Air Force Reserve Command, Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS) Manager


--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
C isn't that hard: void (*(*f[])())() defines f as an array of
unspecified size, of pointers to functions that return pointers to
functions that return void.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 40 October 3rd 08 03:13 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 October 1st 04 02:31 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 September 2nd 04 05:15 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 May 1st 04 07:29 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 April 5th 04 03:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.