![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Emily" wrote in message . .. I'm not a working commercial pilot. I work in the industry, but not flying. I think you've misunderstood much of what I'm saying. When the cop stopped me for taking photos, I wasn't in a restricted area but a public observation area. I wasn't requested to produce ID (not that I had any with me) I was asked why I was taking pictures. I am under NO requirement to explain myself. No, I think I understood you perfectly. In fact, you are confirming it with this post. What you are saying is absolutely clear. You have every right of course to approach these issues as you see fit, but what I'm seeing is that because you were approached by a "cop" in a public observation area instead of a restricted area and asked why you were taking pictures, your immediate response to this instead of answering the question was to instantly revert to your conception of your "rights" instead of simply cooperating with the request. Even here, in this post, you feel the need to CAPITALIZE the word "NO" in the sentence stating "I am under NO requirement to explain myself" which is a clear indication to me at least,that your prime concern during this incident and indeed even before the incident occurred, wasn't airport security at all but the fact that you felt you were being "hassled" by this security person because of your "understanding" concerning an imagined difference between a public and a restricted area on an airport and how that difference affects security issues. Let me advise you right here and now that when it comes to a duly appointed security officer acting in that capacity anywhere on airport property, asking you why you are taking pictures on the airport, it doesn't matter where you are on that airport. That security officer has every right to approach you in a reasonable manner and ask you to explain what you are doing. At the point you are approached in this reasonable manner, it is incumbent on you to supply a reasonable answer to that security officer. Aside from the legalities involved, doing this, rather than doing what you did, is not only the right response for a person concerned with airport security, but the prudent response as well. As I said, from what I have read of your posting here, you and I are natural adversaries, at least from my point of view anyway :-)). I simply think your attitude is totally out of line on this issue. This is of course no big deal at all . Happens all the time on Usenet. Some people are just better off avoiding each other :-)) Hey......all the very best to you. Dudley Henriques |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
God Honest | Naval Aviation | 2 | July 24th 03 04:45 AM |