![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A 32 Seacamp with the recommended ammo is more effective
than the standard 38 Special 158 grain RN. It is reliable, lethal on a headshot, lethal on a heart shot, and it is available when nothing else might be. My choice is a Colt Officer's ACP .45 ACP with 200 grain +P HP, carried behind the hip in a holster of my own design. But since most people do not have unlimited funds, people carry what they have. Any gun, in any caliber is better than a big gun locked away at home. There are several small .45s on the market, http://www.kimberamerica.com/pistols/ultracarry/ are not much bigger than the Seacamp. Dirty Harry not withstanding, really big handguns are not first choice for self-defense, except where there are large bears, lions or other 1,000 pound monsters. Ruger makes the 480 and 454 Alaskan and S&W has the snubby versions of the .500, but these are just too big and powerful for anti-personnel use. Too much power delays repeat shots and if there are two or more attackers you need repeat shots. The 40 S&W and 45 ACP are about ideal, the 9 mm [9x19 Luger/Parabellum/NATO] is a good minimum unless some other factor, such as physical weakness in the hands, or just no way to carry or control something bigger. But remember the point is to protect yourself, a gun may scare the attacker into flight without a shot being fired. A shot fired that hits the right place is better than a miss with a 44 Magnum. The .22 LT HP is pretty effective at killing but it is not a stopper. The bigger bullet has a better chance of stopping the attacker and may not be as lethal as some smaller calibers. But ideally, an attacker will never attack because they will be worried that you may be armed. If they do attack, the sight of your gun may scare them away [this is very common]. If you have to shoot, you want to make them stop their attack, you want to stun them into complete inaction instantaneously. Bottom-line, you want to go home. If you have to shoot someone with justification, call the police as soon as you can, request an ambulance, tell the 911 operator the basic facts. Don't alter any part of the crime scene or nothing you say will be believed. Don't move the body, except as needed to provide first aid. Don't decide that you need more "justification" and drop a knife or gun if you don't see one after the shooting. Try to keep his buddies away, they will take his gun or knife and hide it. If you have a camera phone, take pictures while you're calling. Don't say too much... have your lawyers 24/7 contact number. -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... | Jim Macklin wrote: | Have you seen a 32 Seacamp? | | I'm not sure that simply making an attacker mad is a good self-defense | strategy. :-) | | Or did you mean to throw the weapon at the attacker? | | Matt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
God Honest | Naval Aviation | 2 | July 24th 03 04:45 AM |