![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:31:20 -0700, Greg Copeland wrote:
To be clear...I do not believe that reflected the type of flight services they provide (IFR, VFR). For all I know it was local tower jargon. I've no proof, but I've always assumed that this label referred to the level of service that could be provided in IFR conditions. For example, CDW is (as far as I know) capable of handling a single IFR (or SVFR) operation in its airspace at a time. The reason: it cannot provide separation. TEB, on the other hand, provides separation and so can handle concurrent IFRers. Yet both airports are in their own class D airspaces. From an equipment perspective, TEB has its own RADAR while CDW has a BRITE from EWR. More, the local geography is such that only about half the pattern is visible on the BRITE (due to a hill's shadow). I assume that the equipment difference is the cause of the difference in services, but it's also possible that the difference in services is why the equipment is different. - Andrew |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
finding old ADF equipment ... where ? | [email protected] | Piloting | 2 | March 6th 06 03:25 AM |
XC training and rentals in the US? | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 4 | April 9th 05 08:08 AM |
An aviation dating (or flying buddy finding) service idea | Slav Inger | Piloting | 25 | February 15th 04 10:24 AM |
Rentals in Colorado | PhyrePhox | Piloting | 11 | December 27th 03 03:45 AM |
Finding a partnership | Greg | Owning | 11 | November 10th 03 08:40 PM |