![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"RST Engineering" wrote in message
... [...] Warbirds, you are not welcome at Oshkosh. We've all got our pet peeves when it comes to other pilots. Around here, where we don't see warbirds on a regular basis during daily flying, it's the RV "squadron" who do high-speed, low passes down Lake Sammamish, or the Mustang replica pilot who does his "overhead break" to a landing at the airport, or any number of other pilots doing stupid pilot tricks. Ironically, if I were to have to call out the group of pilots who cause the most trouble around here, it'd be the people flying experimentals, and primarily homebuilts. Based on that, using your train of thought, I'd want all experimentals banned from Oshkosh. I'm thinking that probably wouldn't go over too well, though. ![]() As far as the warbirds themselves, IMHO while there may indeed be a general attitude problem among them, the real problem is attitude problems generally. From the various descriptions I've read here alone of events at Oshkosh, never mind elsewhere, it's clear that the real issue is that failing to conform to procedures and fly safely is basically condoned. Would it be a lot of work for the FAA to file actions against each and every pilot who violates basic safety common sense (the FAA loves 91.13...they could get to use it a lot at Oshkosh), FARs, and procedures outlined in the NOTAM? Damn straight it would be. The first year. For that matter, they need not go after everyone...just triage the offenders, and go after the worst. Most important: make sure each and every certificate action is VERY well publicized. It might take a year or two for pilots to figure out that there just is no room for screwing around, but I'm sure they would. Each year, there would be fewer and fewer pilots who need reprimands, and on average the severity of the incidents should reduce as well. Problems will never be eliminated, but it sounds as though right now there's a LOT of low-hanging fruit that needs to be harvested. Are warbirds a problem? Well...perhaps. But it's not like anyone seems to be taking the safety issues seriously generally. IMHO, it's a bit premature to be banning specific classes of airplanes and pilots from Oshkosh, when huge strides in safety could be made overall by focusing on the BAD pilots first (and if the majority of the bad pilots are flying warbirds, well then you help get rid of the warbirds without actually explicitly banning them ![]() Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Get Rid Of Warbirds At Oshkosh | RST Engineering | Piloting | 131 | August 11th 06 06:00 AM |
Oshkosh Reflections | Jay Honeck | Owning | 44 | August 7th 05 02:31 PM |
Oshkosh Reflections | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 45 | August 7th 05 02:31 PM |
Oshkosh EAA Warbirds ??? | Paul | Restoration | 0 | July 11th 04 04:17 AM |
How I got to Oshkosh (long) | Doug | Owning | 2 | August 18th 03 12:05 AM |