![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Martin" wrote in message ... Peter Duniho wrote: "RST Engineering" wrote in message ... [...] Warbirds, you are not welcome at Oshkosh. We've all got our pet peeves when it comes to other pilots. Around here, where we don't see warbirds on a regular basis during daily flying, it's the RV "squadron" who do high-speed, low passes down Lake Sammamish, or the Mustang replica pilot who does his "overhead break" to a landing at the airport, or any number of other pilots doing stupid pilot tricks. How is an overhead break a "stupid pilot trick?" Then again, maybe we should clarify some terms. My interpretation of overhead break means entering an upwind over the runway, then flying a tight pattern from there, usually involving a tight turn from upwind to cross-/downwind. The rest of the approach is flown as normal. I've been watching an F-15 squadron fly overhead breaks in SAV for a month. Nothing looks unsafe about it. We fly the same kind of break when we come back from some formation work. I do this as an alternative to a straight-in landing, especially if there is other traffic. As long as you announce what you're doing there shouldn't be a problem... unless you consider formation flight or patterns smaller than a mile on a side to be inherently dangerous. An approach flown from an initial overhead break has a practical side as well. In the P51 for example, flying a regular pattern with reduced manifold pressure can really foul up the plugs on you. An overhead approach allows a tight in circular pattern that can be flown with the power up in the range that keeps the plugs clean; allows for better visibility, and allows for easier positioning without losing the runway under the nose. This doesn't mean that pilots flying high performance airplanes should arbitrarily use these approaches without prior approval or radio contact to clear first. It just means that in high performance airplanes, this type of approach is requested for practical reasons by practical pilots who know exactly what they are doing and have no wish to be showing off or violating anyone's airspace. Dudley Henriques Ex P51 pilot........among others :-)) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Oshkosh Reflections | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 54 | August 16th 05 09:24 PM |
Oshkosh Reflections | Jay Honeck | Owning | 44 | August 7th 05 02:31 PM |
Oshkosh Reflections | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 45 | August 7th 05 02:31 PM |
Oshkosh EAA Warbirds ??? | Paul | Restoration | 0 | July 11th 04 04:17 AM |
How I got to Oshkosh (long) | Doug | Owning | 2 | August 18th 03 12:05 AM |