![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
... "Bela P. Havasreti" wrote in message ... If a straight-in works for you (and you prefer it over an overhead approach), great. Some folks may prefer to do an overhead approach (and for the record, they're not typically done "on the deck", but rather at pattern altitude). You aren't paying attention. The ones I'm complaining about are NOT done at pattern altitude. You think overhead approaches aren't as safe as straight-ins. You aren't paying attention. The ones I'm complaining about are NOT as safe as straight-ins. Pete IMHO, the ones you are complaining about are not properly called an overhead break or an overhead approach. My best guess is that a couple of local "hot doggers" are simply calling their activity an overhead aproach in an attempt to give it a legitimate sounding name. Clearly, trading speed for altitude and popping up into the pattern around mid-field is not an approved maneuver, and is only slightly less insane than spinning down into the pattern. OTOH, an overhead approach (as normally described) has a lot of utility as has been pointed out eslewhere in this thread. Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Get Rid Of Warbirds At Oshkosh | RST Engineering | Piloting | 131 | August 11th 06 06:00 AM |
Oshkosh Reflections | Jay Honeck | Owning | 44 | August 7th 05 02:31 PM |
Oshkosh Reflections | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 45 | August 7th 05 02:31 PM |
Oshkosh EAA Warbirds ??? | Paul | Restoration | 0 | July 11th 04 04:17 AM |
How I got to Oshkosh (long) | Doug | Owning | 2 | August 18th 03 12:05 AM |